- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
“IsRon Paul the savior of libertarians? That’s what many are claiming about the Texas Republican who ran on the Libertarian ticket for president in 1988,”James Kirchick writes at the America’s Future Foundation’s “Brainwash” Web site (www.affbrainwash.com).
“Andrew Sullivan, who styles himself a classical liberal, has been trumpeting Paul ever since the GOP primary debate in South Carolina last month in which Paul went toe-to-toe with Rudy Giuliani over the cause of 9/11. ‘Ron Paul, for all his faults, is fresh air. We need more of it,’ Sullivan wrote last month. … Paul seems to be the libertarian dream candidate,” Mr. Kirchick said.
“Paul markets himself as an ideologically pure libertarian — a capital ‘L’ libertarian of the sort that people who refuse to carry driver’s licenses or pay federal income taxes can admire. So committed to a strict interpretation of the Constitution, he’s something of a caricature in a Congress full of big-spenders, earning the title ‘Dr. No’ for voting against each and every federal spending bill.
“He supports unfettered free trade and a non-interventionist foreign policy. He supports the abolition of a variety of Cabinet-level federal agencies. But, in actuality, Paul is a selective libertarian. On the issue of gay rights — a cause that intellectually consistent libertarians ought to support — Paul is no better than his socially conservative primary opponents like [Kansas Sen.] Sam Brownback or [Colorado Rep.] Tom Tancredo.”
A lawsuit accusing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s chief strategist of illegally intercepting e-mails has been withdrawn and the legal battle between him and former associates has been resolved, the parties said Wednesday.
Penn, Schoen & Berland said former vice presidentMitchell E. Markel dropped his suit against the firm and its founder, Mark Penn, who is strategist and pollster to the Democratic presidential candidate. A separate suit that the firm had filed a week earlier against Mr. Markel and Michael J. Berland, another associate who once polled for New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, was also dismissed and a settlement was reached, the Associated Press reports.
Mr. Markel had claimed in his e-mail wiretapping suit that the firm was illegally monitoring messages sent from his personal BlackBerry after he left and started a rival company. Penn, Schoen & Berland did not dispute that e-mails were intercepted but said it owned the e-mails because they were routed through the company’s account.
In dropping the suit, Mr. Markel agreed that Penn, Schoen & Berland had a right to read the e-mails and withdrew his claim that the firm acted improperly, according to a statement attributed to all parties that came from firm spokesman Jason Schechter.
“This week’s release of a two-page summary of the National Intelligence Estimate is being greeted by the usual media suspects as evidence that the war on terror has been a squandered effort,” the Wall Street Journal says in an editorial.
“We read it as a stark reminder that al Qaeda and other radical Islamist groups continue to pose an urgent threat to our security, and that 9/11 was not the terrorist one-off that some liberals wish it were so they can switch the subject to global warming and after-school programs,” the newspaper said.
“In its ‘key judgments,’ the NIE observes that ‘greatly increased worldwide counterterrorism efforts over the past five years have constrained the ability of al Qaeda to attack the U.S. Homeland.’ It notes that the measures put into place since September 11, 2001, have ‘helped disrupt known plots’ — last year’s foiled attempt to blow up airliners over the North Atlantic being just one of them. And it observes that terrorist groups ‘perceive the Homeland as a harder target to strike than on 9/11.’ If this is evidence of the administration’s alleged failures, we need more of them.”
In Tuesday’s paper, this column slightly mangled a quote from Newt Gingrich, the Republican former House speaker. Mr. Gingrich actually said, “In a world that fails, the federal government cannot find somewhere between 10 million and 20 million illegal immigrants, even if they are sitting.”
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Malaysia Airlines says plane on route to Beijing missing
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again