- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Court calls for thorough reviews of Gitmo cases
Question of the Day
The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit yesterday ruled that federal judges must review all evidence — not just what the military chooses — when detainees now held at U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay in Cuba challenge their status as “enemy combatants.”
The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel rejected Bush administration arguments, which sought to limit what judges and the detainees’ attorneys could review when considering whether the Combatant Status Review Tribunal appropriately designated a detainee as an “enemy combatant.”
“In order to review a tribunal’s determination that, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, a detainee is an enemy combatant, the court must have access to all the information available to the tribunal,” wrote Appeals Court Judge Douglas Ginsburg in the majority opinion.
“We therefore hold that, contrary to the position of the government, the record on review consists of all the information a tribunal is authorized to obtain and consider, pursuant to the procedures specified by the Secretary of Defense,” he said.
Joining Judge Ginsburg in the ruling were Judges Judith Rogers and Karen Lecraft Henderson. Judge Ginsburg was appointed to the bench by President Reagan; Judge Rogers by President Clinton; and Judge Henderson by the first President Bush.
The appeals court ruling included a protective order adopting a presumption that counsel for a detainee “has a need to know” the classified information relating to his client’s case, except that the government may withhold from counsel, but not from the court, certain highly sensitive information.
Judge Ginsburg, in the ruling, said the court “must be able to view the government information with the aid of counsel for both parties; a detainee’s counsel who has seen only the subset of the government information presented to the tribunal is in no position to aid the court.”
The ruling is expected to be considered by the Supreme Court when it decides whether detainees at Guantanamo should have greater access to U.S. civilian courts.
Currently, when detainees are brought before the Combatant Status Review Tribunal, or military tribunal, they are not allowed to have an attorney with them and the Pentagon decides what evidence to put forward.
There is no obligation for the government to turn over evidence that might be used to show the detainee is not guilty.
If the tribunal rules a prisoner is an enemy combatant, he can challenge that decision in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, although government attorneys have argued that federal judges have the authority only to review the evidence the Pentagon chooses to put forward.
The ruling yesterday came in a challenge brought by eight foreign nationals captured abroad and held at Guantanamo, each seeking review of a tribunal decision declaring him an enemy combatant — which makes them subject to detention for the duration of hostilities. Seven have been held since their capture in Pakistan in 2001.
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- PRUDEN: 'Tis the season for apologies
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Paul Rondeau exposes the propaganda, media tricks, and government policies that undermine our families, faith, freedom…and even life itself
Implement these actionable tips, how-to’s and best practices in 10 minutes or less to leverage online communications and technology for brand, business and career development.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow