The 1997 Federal Communications Commission order that granted licenses to XM Satellite Radio Inc. and what is now Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. included a provision requiring the companies to make receivers capable of accessing content from both services.
Now, 10 years later, such devices are not commercially available.
Michael Hartleib, a California real estate agent, earlier this month filed a petition “to clarify the lack of enforcement and implementation of the interoperable mandate.”
The issue of interoperable receivers has attracted public scrutiny in recent months in the context of the proposed merger between District-based XM and New York-based Sirius, and not in reference to the 1997 licensing rule.
As listed on the FCC Web site, that requirement — FCC Rule 47 Sec. 25.144(a)(3)(ii) — says each applicant shall: “Certify that its satellite [digital audio radio service] system includes a receiver that will permit end users to access all licensed satellite [digital audio radio service] systems that are operational or under construction.”
The companies have tied the development of interoperable radios to approval of the $5 billion merger.
“When interoperable radios are commercially available, consumers who want to have access to the complete offerings of both companies will be able to do so on a single device,” Sirius Chief Executive Officer Mel Karmazin, who would head the combined company, told the Senate in April.
“The opportunity exists for us to commercially market an interoperable radio. Right now we have developed it. There’s one in my office right now,” Mr. Karmazin told This Week In Consumer Electronics earlier this month.
XM and Sirius say they have complied with the rule, which does not specify a date. In a joint filing with the FCC Tuesday night, the companies argued that the agency rules require that they certify a design for such a receiver — as opposed to making them commercially available — which they have done.
“In its implementing rules for the satellite radio service, the FCC required all satellite radio licensees to develop designs for an interoperable radio and to certify that they have done so,” the companies said. “Opponents have been unable to point to any commission requirement that the companies produce, distribute, market or sell interoperable receivers.”
The companies cite the FCC order issued on March 3, 1997, in which the commission discussed its licensing requirements. That order said applicants for a satellite radio service must “certify that its [digital audio radio service] system will include a receiver design that will permit users to access all licensed [digital audio radio service] systems that are operational or under construction.”
Unlike the nearly identical licensing requirement, the commission’s order adds the word “design.” In the same paragraph, however, the commission elaborated on its intentions: “We believe that, at the very least, consumers should be able to access the services from all licensed satellite [digital audio radio service] systems and our rule on receiver interoperability accomplishes this.”
Neither FCC staff nor the office of Chairman Kevin J. Martin would comment on or clarify the interoperability rule, citing the agency’s pending review of the merger.View Entire Story
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A mother of three and a passionate conservative, Shirley Husar changes the game.
Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall