Judge to rule on legality of abusive driver fees
RICHMOND — The first court ruling on whether harsh new fees Virginia imposes on its worst drivers are constitutional is due from a Henrico County judge within a week.
Attorneys for Anthony Price, convicted yesterday of driving on a suspended license for the fifth time, argued that forcing Mr. Price to pay $750 in fees that don’t apply to people who live outside Virginia violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.
The case unwittingly thrust Mr. Price, a shy carpet installer, into the vanguard of an intense statewide furor over “civil remedial fees” that took effect July 1.
Mr. Price declined to comment as he left the courthouse with his grandmother, his ride to and from court.
Virginians outraged that nonresidents are exempt from the fees have clamored for the law’s immediate repeal in a special legislative session while defense lawyers work to overturn the law in court. By yesterday, nearly 162,000 people had signed an online petition calling for a repeal of the law.
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, on his monthly radio program on Richmond’s WRVA and the Virginia News Network, continued to oppose calling lawmakers back to Richmond before the regular session in January.
“This was part of a comprehensive transportation package to try and raise money for transportation and you got a lot of citizens out there that say, ‘By gosh, don’t raise our taxes; find money another way.’ Be careful what you wish for,” said Mr. Kaine, a Democrat.
The fees were passed this year to help endow the first major transportation funding law in a generation. They range from the fee Mr. Price may have to pay — three annual installments of $250 — to $3,000 over three years for driving-related felonies.
Because lawmakers wanted the revenue for highway maintenance, they enacted the surcharges as fees, which Virginia is powerless to collect outside its boundaries. The state can collect fines anywhere, but the state Constitution mandates that revenue from fines be used exclusively for education, not transportation.
“The state cannot discriminate against one class of people,” Mr. Cooley told Judge Yeatts. “If we’re going to be assessing these fees from dangerous drivers, then we ought to be assessing it from everybody, resident or nonresident.”
“Let me ask you this,” the judge said, looking at Mr. Reid. “Could the legislature pass legislation that would impose these fees only on out-of-state residents?”