- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
Sudan accepts deployment of U.N.-AU force
Question of the Day
In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Sudanese President Omar Bashir said he would take the proposed force as long as the soldiers and commanders are all Africans.
“We have accepted the hybrid approach,” Sudanese Ambassador to the United Nations Abdelmahmood Abdelhaleem said.
“Our concerns have been met because we have been assured of the African character of the force, with an African commander as well,” Mr. Abdelhaleem told The Washington Times.
He said his government also wanted the AU’s Peace and Security Council to play an oversight role in addition to the U.N. Security Council.
U.N. officials said the agreement is far from firm and that unresolved issues remain, including the nationalities of troops that would bolster an existing 7,000 AU peacekeeping force.
One U.N. official described the announcement as more of “a solid first step” than a breakthrough.
U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said that he and other ambassadors from nations on the U.N. Security Council were skeptical.
“If it is an unconditional acceptance, this would be positive step which we would welcome, but if it is only Africans involved and no non-Africans, that is putting conditions on the acceptance, and that would be unacceptable.”
An estimated 200,000 people have been killed in the western Sudanese region of Darfur, and 2.5 million have been forced from their homes since 2003, when the government and its militias began battling a rebel insurgency.
Negotiations with Khartoum, the Sudanese capital, to beef up the AU force with the resources and manpower of an international U.N. peacekeeping force have led to diplomatic frustration since the beginning.
Before the hybrid force can reach its full 23,000-member capacity, peacekeepers will have to build roads, figure out how to deliver water and overcome other logistical roadblocks.
U.N. officials said yesterday that they would try to find as many African peacekeepers as possible but that the continent’s soldiers are stretched thin on other missions.
“The next step for us is the force generation phase, and we are starting that now,” a peacekeeping official said. “We will definitely start with potential African troop contributing countries, and we hope we get what we need. But if we aren’t getting the numbers and capabilities we need … we’re not going to drag our feet because the most important thing is to deploy as soon as possible.”
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq