RALEIGH, N.C. — District Attorney Mike Nifong will be disbarred for his disastrous prosecution of three Duke University lacrosse players falsely accused of rape, a disciplinary committee decided yesterday. Even the veteran prosecutor said the punishment was appropriate.
“This matter has been a fiasco. There’s no doubt about it,” committee Chairman F. Lane Williamson said.
Mr. Nifong sat motionless, one hand resting over his mouth, as Mr. Williamson recounted how he engaged in dishonest and deceitful conduct. He said Mr. Nifong’s early comments about the case — which included a confident proclamation that he wouldn’t allow Durham to become known for “a bunch of lacrosse players from Duke raping a black girl” — were purposefully designed to boost his campaign for district attorney.
“At the time he was facing a primary, and yes, he was politically naive,” Mr. Williamson said. “But we can draw no other conclusion that those initial statements he made were to further his political ambitions.”
Mr. Nifong will not appeal the punishment, his attorney said.
“He hopes this helps restore some of the confidence in the criminal justice system of North Carolina,” attorney David Freedman said. “On one hand, it’s very devastating. On the other hand, he’s been going through this process for a long time, so you always have some semblance of relief when the process is over with, regardless of the outcome.”
The North Carolina State Bar charged Mr. Nifong with breaking several rules of professional conduct, including lying to both the court and bar investigators and withholding critical DNA test results from the players’ defense attorneys.
The committee, after deliberating for a little more than an hour, unanimously agreed with the bar on almost every charge — including the most serious accusations — that Mr. Nifong’s actions involved “dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation.”
State Bar prosecutor Douglas Brocker told the committee that as Mr. Nifong investigated the accusations that a stripper was raped and beaten at a March 2006 party thrown by Duke’s lacrosse team, he charged forward “toward condemnation and injustice,” weaving a “web of deception that has continued up through this hearing.”
“Mr. Nifong did not act as a minister of justice, but as a minister of injustice,” Mr. Brocker said.
The verdicts and the punishment did not appear to surprise Mr. Nifong, who acknowledged during sometimes tearful testimony Friday that he likely would be punished for getting “carried away a little bit” when talking about the case.
Mr. Williamson questioned why it took several months for the defense to obtain DNA test results that found genetic material from several men in the accuser’s underwear and body, but none from any lacrosse player.
“It wasn’t just one little oversight,” he said later. “This was conduct over an extended period in a very high-profile case.”
Aware of those test results, Mr. Nifong pressed ahead with the case anyway and won indictments against Dave Evans, Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty. State prosecutors later concluded the three players were “innocent” victims of a rogue prosecutor’s “tragic rush to accuse.”