- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Letters to the editor
The situation in Pakistan
Wilson John’s assumption, in “Unrest in the provinces” (Op-Ed, Friday), that the peace agreement in Waziristan was hammered out under pressure from the army, is baseless because the accord was concluded at the insistence of the tribal chiefs who committed themselves not to allow terrorist activities in Pakistan or in Afghanistan. Of course, military command input is given due consideration in such cases, and to construe it as pressure or dissension only indicates the ignorance of the decisionmaking process.
It is inappropriate to imagine that troop withdrawal was a tradeoff in the accord. Not a single troop has been withdrawn from the region; instead, two more army brigades have been deployed quite recently, raising the troop strength more than 85,000 in a region that is 20 times smaller than Afghanistan, where there are only 40,000 troops in U.S.-led coalition forces.
The peace agreement is a multi-pronged strategy to win the hearts and minds of the people and is aimed at weaning away the locals from the terrorists. This policy is paying dividends as the tribal chiefs have killed more than 300 foreign militants during the last couple of months. There are always some spoilers in such accords, but their designs must not be allowed to get the upper hand. That is exactly the case with the peace agreement.
It is absurd to assume that Taliban are a “strategic tool” for Pakistan. They are killing our people and carrying out suicide bombings in the country.
The U.S. media and Capitol Hill may also ponder why Americans are not succeeding in Iraq despite their heaviest military presence, equipped with the state-of-the-art technology. The situation is getting worse with every passing day. Of course, U.S. troops are doing their best as well-trained professionals, but they are, at present, seemingly helpless in the face of suicide bombings. It is a long war and the trust deficit will only strengthen the enemy.
M. AKRAM SHAHEEDI
Embassy of Pakistan
Comic relief in Annapolis
Wednesday’s article about Michael Busch, Maryland House Speaker, was comical (“Busch warns of local aid cuts,” Page 1). I suspect Mr. Busch doesn’t think of himself as a comedian, but for those of us who pay attention, he is good for a guffaw anytime he opens his mouth.
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- EDITORIAL: As jobs vanish, Obama wants more of same
- Stolen European passports on Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again