- The Washington Times - Monday, June 4, 2007

There is a growing appreciation of several facts about the war we are in. First, we are most immediately up against an ideology — Islamofascism describes it well — that has unmistakable totalitarian political characteristics and ambitions. It is in the service of the goal of global domination of this theo-ideology that adherents employ terrorism. Terror is a means to an end, not a goal in its own right, let alone an enemy.

Second, to wage successfully a counterideological war requires means other than military ones. Taken together, these instruments have come to be called “soft power” (as opposed to the traditional kind of “hard power” represented by armies, navies, air forces and nuclear weapons).

Third, given that the stakes in this war are nothing less than the survival of the Free World, every effort must be made to strengthen the effectiveness and impact of those instruments of soft power particularly relevant to challenging, undermining and, with luck, defeating a virulent totalitarian ideology. This is quintessentially true of those relevant to disseminating information that serves such purposes.

Given these insights, it is peculiar, not to say confounding, that the United States has failed so miserably over the last five years of this War for the Free World to value properly the role of government-sponsored international broadcasting in its outcome. In fact, the history of this period is one in which America’s leaders have allowed the systematic dismantling of much of its capacity for waging the war of ideas via such broadcasts and woefully misapplied much of what remains.

Consider just the latest rounds of cuts being proposed in fiscal 2008 budget for the Voice of America (VOA, the official U.S. information network) and the “freedom radios” — government-underwritten international broadcasters intended to operate as though they were truly independent, reliable sources of information in countries where that is not otherwise assured, namely Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) and Radio Free Asia (RFA).

The Bush administration’s planned cuts would:

Eliminate virtually all English-language VOA broadcasts worldwide, apart from Africa, which would see its service cut nearly in half. This occurs at the same time as increasingly assertive governments in Russia and China have launched 24/7 propaganda radio services in our native language.

Reduce by a third RFE/RL’s Russian-language broadcasts to Russia from 24 to 18 hours a day, and take VOA’s Russian-language radio off the air altogether. This would come while the authoritarian Vladimir Putin is making a comprehensive effort to deny Russians access to truthful information about their country and the world. Moreover, Mr. Putin’s repressive measures could end the Voice of America’s remaining TV broadcasts in Russian at any moment.

Drop altogether broadcasts by: the VOA in Cantonese, Croatian, Greek, Georgian, Thai and Uzbek; RFE/RL’s Macedonian service; and Radio Free Asia’s broadcasts in Cantonese. American interests in China, Southeastern Europe, Central and Southeast Asia would be negatively affected.

Eliminate the VOA’s radio broadcasts in Ukrainian, Serbian, Albanian, Bosnian, Macedonian, Hindi. Given the ongoing turmoil in Ukraine, the Balkans and Kashmir can we afford to do anything that might reduce our presence or influence there?

Reduce radio broadcasts by: the Voice of America to China in Tibetan and to Africa in Portuguese; RFE/RL’s services in Ukrainian, Romanian, Kazakh and South Slavic languages in Kazakh; and RFA’s broadcasts in Tibetan.

The cumulative effect of these cuts alone would be to write off more than 18 million listeners each week around the world. Who could possibly choose voluntarily to eliminate such an audience, much of which is in places critical to the future course of this war?

Sadly, such prospective, painful reductions in service would come on the heels of years of earlier, similarly ill-advised decisions that have already placed greater priority on building audience share in the Middle East by substituting pop music for much of the news and information programming so vital to counter-ideological struggles; dismantled the short-wave broadcasting systems that remain critical to reaching some critical audiences; permitted our enemies in Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran to use U.S.-broadcasting arms like the Arabic-language Al Hurra television network as a propaganda platform; and made taboo certain topics — such as the prospects for and necessity of the overthrow of Iran’s regime.

Unless reversed, the cumulative effect of these past and pending actions will be the unplugging of some of the most important conduits of America’s soft power. Such behavior amounts to an egregious example of unilateral disarmament in War of Ideas. The notion that budgetary austerity requires such cuts is laughable. The $26 million it would require to prevent the 2008 cuts is chump-change in a $2.9 trillion budget. And the costs associated with yielding the battlespace to our ideological foes will be incalculably higher.

Fortunately, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Agencies has a chance (today) to prevent such a mistake and, better yet, to begin rebuilding the information part of America’s soft power capabilities. Chairwoman Nita Lowey and her ranking Republican colleague, Frank Wolf, are fully aware of the need for a true war of ideas. If they can prevent our further disarmament in this war, and set the stage for the substantial expansion of America’s capacity to delegitimize our foes and inspire and empower their opponents, there may yet be hope for defeating the Islamofascists and their enablers.

Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy and a columnist for The Washington Times.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide