- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Democrats benefit from public shift on war
Question of the Day
As the war in Iraq and the broader battle against terror were being fought abroad, the political calculus at home changed, with public opinion shifting to favor the Democrats on an issue that long had been a Republican winner.
Republicans won the 2002 and 2004 elections in part because voters were convinced that Democrats were weak on defense and lacked the political will to protect the U.S. from terrorists. That changed as the war in Iraq grew more unpopular — a major factor in the sweeping Democratic gains last fall, allowing the party to regain congressional power.
Anti-war sentiment has been bolstered lately, with polls showing the majority of Americans disapproving of President Bush’s plan to send a “surge” of 21,500 more troops to Iraq. Most surveyed instead want to see troops withdrawn from Iraq with varying degrees of dispatch.
Rep. Jim McGovern, Massachusetts Democrat, said oversight hearings and the House’s nonbinding resolution showing disapproval with the surge plan were “long overdue,” and helped the public to realize their calls for action on Iraq have been heard.
“The American people are way ahead of the politicians in Washington,” he said. “In many cases, we’re playing catch-up, but Democrats have been able to give some meaning to public dissatisfaction with the war.
“Now the challenge is how the war comes to an end,” he said.
Despite assertions the Democrats are all on the same page when it comes to war strategy, party leaders have spent weeks trying to craft a unified position. They will give details today for a plan that would link funding to troop readiness and put more responsibility on the Iraqi government to meet benchmarks.
Rep. John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania, who is chairman of the defense subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, yesterday acknowledged the Democrats “don’t have the votes” to cut off troop funding.
“The public doesn’t want, they don’t want that to happen. They want the troops to be entirely funded,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
But that hasn’t stopped Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio, a Democratic presidential hopeful, from pushing a bill to use existing funding to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq and seek to replace them with an international peacekeeping force.
“I don’t look at polls,” the outspoken war critic said. “I look at casualty counts. [The American people] are not interested in polls, either. They want the troops home.”
Two national polls taken last week each showed 46 percent of respondents want Congress to use the power of the purse.
In a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll, 46 percent said they would personally “vote against funding the war altogether to try to force a withdrawal.” In the survey of 900 registered voters taken Tuesday and Wednesday, 45 percent wanted to keep funding the current level of troops and 9 percent were unsure.
In the other poll, an ABC News/Washington Post survey of 1,082 adults conducted Feb. 22-25, 46 percent said they would support “Congress trying to block Bush’s [surge] plan” by “restricting funding for the war,” versus 51 percent opposed and 3 percent undecided.
That same survey also showed more support — 58 percent — for Mr. Murtha’s approach of putting onerous readiness rules that U.S. forces could not meet, thus choking off the war. And 56 percent said U.S. troops should be withdrawn even if Iraq is left unstable.
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq