- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Tufts case called hit to speech
A campus magazine at Tufts University has been found guilty of “harassment” by a disciplinary board, a decision that could establish “a terrifying precedent,” according to an academic-freedom group.
The Primary Source, a conservative monthly published by Tufts students, commemorated “Islamic Awareness Week” last month on the Medford, Mass., campus with a full-page “supplement” headlined “Islam — Arabic Translation: Submission,” that cited facts about Muslim history.
That unsigned article, along with a satirical “Christmas carol” in the magazine’s December issue mocking the university’s affirmative-action program, was cited as a violation of Tufts’s “nondiscrimination policy.”
“From now on, all material published in the Primary Source (whether characterized as satirical or otherwise) must be attributed to named author(s) or contributor(s),” the university’s Committee on Student Life ruled, recommending “that student governance consider the behavior of student groups in future decisions concerning recognition and funding.”
Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), said the magazine’s article about Islam was “one-sided,” but warned that the Tufts ruling endangers students’ rights to free speech.
“The students were responding to what they thought was a one-sided and overly rosy depiction of Islam during Islamic Awareness Week,” the FIRE official said. “But is it unprotected harassment? One certainly hopes not, or else ‘harassment’ just became a truly lethal threat to free speech — an ‘exception’ that completely swallows the rule.”
The panel’s decision “appeared not even to raise the issue of whether or not the statements … were true, but turned only on how they made people feel,” Mr. Lukianoff said.
In a signed editorial, the magazine’s editor in chief called for Tufts to honor “its moral obligations to protect freedom of speech.”
“The Primary Source strongly believes that any limitation on controversial and even ‘hurtful’ speech will create a ‘chilling effect’ and lead this University down a dangerous road,” Matthew Schuster wrote. “A university’s primary goal should be fostering an intellectually thriving atmosphere that teaches students how to think, not what to think.”
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.