Pro-lifers ready for a comeback

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Second of a three-part series

If traditional-values candidates took a beating in the 2006 elections, pro-life causes were pulverized.

Although last month's Supreme Court ruling to uphold the ban on partial-birth abortion was a welcome boost for pro-life forces, they are still recovering from last year's defeats.

For instance, South Dakota, Missouri and Kansas -- all states as red as Dorothy's ruby slippers -- voted against pro-life measures or officials. Parental-notification bills were thrown out in Oregon and California, and in state after state, Republican pro-life stalwarts lost their jobs.

By day's end, America had elected "the most pro-choice Congress in the history of the republic," University of Maryland political science professor Thomas F. Schaller wrote in a column in February in the Baltimore Sun.

Moreover, Mr. Schaller said, if Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York -- or any other Democratic contender -- wins the White House in 2008, "the most pro-choice Congress in American history" will become "the most pro-choice government in American history."

Has America's pro-life movement lost its clout? Is the 34-year abortion war finally ending, with the pro-choice view in command?

In a three-part series, The Washington Times examines the future of the traditional-values movement, including the status of the abortion issue and the role of women.

Abortion warriors on both sides are taking stock of their positions, and both like what they see.

The pro-choice side is touting its "prevention-first" strategy. Introduced in 2005 by Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, the strategy is intended to broaden the abortion issue, create new alliances and appeal to voters whose religious views previously had led them to support Republican candidates.