Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

General Dynamics rakes in contracts

Shares of General Dynamics Corp. are rumbling forward this year as the maker of tanks and ships for the military has won a string of defense contracts.

In just the past two weeks the Falls Church defense giant landed contracts worth nearly $78 million, most recently a $10.5 million award from the Coast Guard, announced yesterday, to provide technical support and program management for the next four years.

The win follows other defense contracts for $24 million this week and $43 million last week.

General Dynamics’ stock, GD on the New York Stock Exchange, is up about 11 percent since the first of this year, compared with 7 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.

“We see more of the same for the foreseeable future,” said Paul H. Nisbet, an industry analyst for the financial firm JSA Research.

The company’s stock closed yesterday at $81.74 a share, down $1.22, or about 1.5 percent, from Friday’s close.

General Dynamics employs about 82,900 people worldwide and projected 2007 revenue of more than $27 billion. Three of the company’s four business units focus on areas including aviation; land and expeditionary combat systems, arms and munitions; shipbuilding and marine systems; and technology.

Its private-sector unit focuses on business jets, such as the Gulfstream, and on technology.

“Their [information technology] operation has gone from virtually nothing 10 years ago to over $10 billion in sales,” Mr. Nisbet said.

Underlying what appears to be a string of successes is a bidding controversy that threatens to cancel one of the company’s biggest shipbuilding contracts.

A team lead by General Dynamics won a contract to build two prototype Littoral Combat Ships for the Navy at a target price of $220 million apiece. The midsized ships can move fast in coastal waters, offering the Navy more effective capabilities to destroy submarines and mines along shorelines.

As manufacturing started on the first prototype, design, production and management problems drove up cost estimates to about $400 million each.

The impatience of the Navy and Congress rose with the cost estimates.

This month, the Senate Appropriations Committee voted to cancel the second of two contracts for the General Dynamics team to build the ships. Although a final vote in Congress is required, the unanimous decision by the Appropriations Committee leaves little doubt that the contract is likely to be rebid. Competitor Raytheon Co. is considered a likely replacement.

General Dynamics has plenty of other contracts to keep its revenue flowing.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, speaks to reporters at the Capitol following a political strategy meeting, in Washington, Tuesday, May 22, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Congress staring over edge of ‘fiscal cliff’

  • Following his attorney Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., (left) Thomas Gore, a campaign treasurer for Mayor Vincent C. Gray, makes his exit from the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse after his plea hearing in the District on Tuesday, May 22, 2012. (Rod Lamkey Jr/The Washington Times)

    Gray under cloud in campaign fraud case

  • Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, speaks Tuesday on Capitol Hill about Startup Act 2.0, a bipartisan effort aimed at jump-starting the economy by making more visas available for immigrants with advanced degrees and those wishing to start businesses. Behind him are (from left) Sen. Mark R. Warner, Virginia Democrat; Internet entrepreneur Steve Case, a member of President Obama's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness; Sen. Jerry Moran, Kansas Republican, and Sen. Christopher A. Coons, Delaware Democrat. (Associated Press)

    Visa changes aimed at skilled workers

  • Happening Now

        Independent voices from the TWT Communities

        Life-Line: Healthful Habits Made Simple

        Gaining familiarity with the psychological underpinnings of hurdles encountered when making lifestyle changes, and modifying these behavioral strategies to improve adherence and attain goals