The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    PULLEN: GOP came unmoored in last decade – it hurt

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Finding gratitude in difficult times

  • Sports

    Leonsis in line to buy Wizards, Verizon Center

  • National

    3 airlines fined $175,000 for stranding passengers

  • National

    Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words

  • Business

    Holiday puts low-cost buses into overtime

  • Politics

    A-listers, fundraisers attend White House state dinner

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Kill this nightmarish bill

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  • EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  • EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points

By

Advocates of amnesty for illegal aliens may be about to suffer another political blow. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, Sen. Dick Lugar and Sen. Chuck Hagel have been trying to attach an amendment to the defense authorization bill that would enact the so-called Dream Act, which would permit illegals to attend college while paying lower in-state tuition rates.

In its original form, the Dream Act, (initially a provision in the omnibus immigration bill that imploded in the Senate in June) was a legislative monstrosity. It would have repealed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which barred states from granting in-state tuition to illegal aliens unless they provide the same discount to all U.S. citizens. But California, New York, Texas and seven other states decided to violate federal law. Under the Dream Act, that would be no problem: It would retroactively repeal the 1996 law — so we could make believe it never existed. But that is just the beginning.

The Dream Act would also provide illegals with a generous new path to amnesty — provided that they unlawfully entered the country prior to age 16 and have been in the United States for at least five years. How's that for a nose-thumbing at law-abiding citizens and immigrants.

Beyond that, all an illegal alien needs to qualify for the amnesty is a high-school diploma or a GED earned in the United States. "If he can persuade an institution of higher education in the United States — any community college, technical school or college — to admit him, that will suffice," law professor Kris Kobach wrote in a recent Heritage Foundation paper. "Any illegal alien who meets these conditions (or can produce fraudulent papers indicating that he meets the conditions) gets immediate legal status in the form of a 'conditional' green card good for six years." In addition, an illegal who applies for the Dream Act amnesty could count his time under conditional green card status toward the five years needed for citizenship, and an illegal would be able to claim "retroactive benefits" to start the citizenship clock running the day the Dream Act is enacted. Taken together, these rules give illegal aliens a faster path to citizenship than lawfully present aliens.

As Americans learn the details of Dream Act, they have once again inundated congressional offices with e-mails and telephone calls protesting it. So, Mr. Durbin is desperately trying to salvage the bill by imposing an age ceiling of 30 on eligibility. He has also promised to remove a provision mandating in-state tuition rates. But one by one, Republicans, including Sens. Jon Kyl and John Cornyn, previously regarded as potential supporters of the Durbin-Lugar-Hagel amendment, are declaring their opposition. The American public is speaking out, and Congress has to listen.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  5. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
More Top Stories »
  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  3. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  4. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. The United Socialist States of America
  3. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  4. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  5. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  3. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  4. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
  5. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  4. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  5. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points
  2. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  3. WH: Obama Afghan decision 'within days'
  4. Kennedy political dynasty in question
  5. The United Socialist States of America

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Gray spends day in Memphis

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.