The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Security

    Obama said to want revised Afghan options

  • Politics

    Bush warns of threats to freedom, economic growth

  • National

    Fort Hood shooting suspect charged with murder

  • Politics

    Obama has fences to mend on Japan trip

  • Business

    Obama calls for jobs forum in December

  • National

    HOLMES: Miscalculating engagement

  • National

    NORRIS: The Senate and the START treaty

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Monday, April 21, 2008

Real facts on REAL ID

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: When the shooter becomes the victim
  • EDITORIAL: A proud legacy trashed
  • EDITORIAL: Conflicts aplenty for Obama nominees
  • EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban

By

To listen to the paranoid debate now taking place over the REAL ID Act in Congress, some state legislatures and the blogosphere, one might think that this legislation was some Bush administration plot to create a national identity card and spy on innocent Americans. The reality is much more serious and mundane. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombings and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, there is a need to set some kind of minimum standards to ensure that driver's licenses and other forms of government-issued identification cannot be tampered with and used by terrorists.

Timothy McVeigh used a fraudulent South Dakota driver's license to rent the Ryder truck in Oklahoma that was used to bomb the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 persons. The Sept. 11 hijackers fraudulently acquired 17 driver's licenses from Florida, California and Arizona, including four duplicates. They also obtained 13 state-issued IDs from Maryland, Virginia and Florida. The IDs were used to open bank accounts, find housing, rent cars and board aircraft on Sept. 11. Ziad Jarrah, the hijacker who piloted the plane that crashed in Shanksville, Pa., and Hani Hanjour, who crashed his plane into the Pentagon, had both obtained Virginia IDs by fraud. Three Salvadoran immigrants living in Virginia (one a legal permanent resident of the United States and the other two illegal aliens) helped four of the Sept. 11 hijackers use fraudulent identification in order to obtain Virginia-issued identification cards.

The Sept. 11 commission recommended that the federal government "set standards for the issuance of birth certifications and sources of identification, such as driver's licenses." In its December 2005 final report, commission members praised Congress for enacting the Real ID Act because it sets minimum standards for boarding an airplane or entering a federal building. The goal of the law is simple: to make it much less likely that in the future, a McVeigh, Jarrah or Hanjour would be able to use a fraudulently obtained identification to commit mass murder. The goal is a self-evidently reasonable one, although we understand why some critics view the Real ID Act as trampling upon civil liberties in an effort to meet that goal.

It's important, however, to understand what the REAL ID legislation does and does not require. For one thing, states retain control over the production and issuance of driver's licenses, and over applicant data and the adjudication of applications.

For another, the Real ID Act does not create a "national database." The law "does just the opposite, keeping data flows narrowly defined," according to Janice Kephart, an attorney who investigated the hijackers travel on behalf of the September 11 commission. "Real ID enables verification of identity information such as [Social Security numbers], birth records, driving records, and immigration status between states and the federal government. The data is limited to defined fields of information with limited personnel access over a network owned and operated by the states," Miss Kephart noted in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last year.

But that is apparently not good enough for Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Illinois, the No 2. Democrat in that chamber, and Sen. Lamar Alexander, Tennessee Republican, the third-ranking GOP member of the Senate. Both lawmakers say they may try to attach an amendment to Homeland Security appropriations legislation that could effectively kill Real ID. The senators say the amendment would simply ensure that the federal government reimburses the state for the costs of carrying out the law. But for the past three years, Mr. Alexander and Mr. Durbin have been tirelessly denouncing the very concept of Real ID, wrongly depicting it as a step toward a national identity card and a scheme to deprive Americans of their civil liberties. In truth, Real ID is a critical means of defense against a future attack. Although additional federal assistance in implementing Real ID is probably warranted, the Senate should kill any back-door effort to sabotage Real ID.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  3. D.C. sniper executed in Virginia
  4. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained
  5. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
More Top Stories »
  1. Families meet as sniper's execution nears
  2. Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.
  3. DeMint tries to ban 'permanent politicians'
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Fort Hood suspect contacted Muslim extremists
  5. Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Houston sheriffs round up thousands of illegals
  3. EDITORIAL: When the shooter becomes the victim
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Fort Hood suspect contacted Muslim extremists
  5. Jordanian sees Jerusalem as a powder keg
More Top Stories »
  1. Tax penalties and prison
  2. Obama's union drive stumbles in N.H.
  3. EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban
  4. Employers offer pet health care as perk
  5. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained

Most Commented

  1. Houston sheriffs round up thousands of illegals
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Fort Hood suspect contacted Muslim extremists
  3. DeMint tries to ban 'permanent politicians'
  4. Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood attack
  5. Kennedy's disability plan could snag health bill
More Top Stories »
  1. D.C. sniper executed in Virginia
  2. Airport rules changed after Ron Paul aide detained
  3. EXCLUSIVE: GOPer Cao: Health vote may end career
  4. EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban
  5. Michigan farm expert opens Marijuana U.

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Portis ruled out

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.