The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with Democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » Blogs

Thursday, August 7, 2008

SHEFFIELD: Profanity greater on liberal blogs

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

wvobiwan

Funny that someone actually documented this, it's been common knowledge in the blogosphere for years. There is a LOT of hate on the left, you only have to read a lefty blog after a prominent conservative dies, or is taken ill. The same situation (when a prominent liberal is ill or dies) on a conservative blog sees expressions of sympathy for the family, usually accompanied by 'while I don't agree with his/her politics, etc'. Just part of the massive, daily hypocracy of the left, where they talk compassion but gut anyone who disagrees with them. Profanity for the left is just a way to get attention for their hate.
Mark as offensive

tomc100

Profanity is part of liberalism. That and being godless and full of hate for other opinions. Just go to any youtube with Obama or McCain and you'll see the pro-Obama, anti-McCain, and anti-Bush loonies spill their hate where every other word is a curse. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Mark as offensive

soxconn

When morals are relative, so is the use of profanity. It's similar to the definition of "is" or the "unequivocal".
Mark as offensive

Cornelius

Profanity is a sign of lack of self-discipline. It is a sign of imprecise thinking. It's no surprise that liberals use it more.
Mark as offensive

hipshot

No surprise. My migration to the conservative side started many decades ago when I noticed that any legitimate questioning of liberal immigration policy was met with a host of accusations. Notice also the behavior difference between past Republican presidents and past Democrat presidents.
Mark as offensive

hipshot

On second thought, we have had a Republican in the White House for almost eight years. Maybe the profanity on the liberal sites will decrease if Obama is elected and liberals start to siphon money from the bank accounts of the rich into theirs, put limits on speech and thought (hate crime laws and media fairness doctine), lose a city or two to terrorists, and formalize immigration and citizenship as entitlement programs for certain groups of people.
Mark as offensive

bandaid

I am a moderate/conservative whose best friend is a moderate/liberal. I have attended many affairs in our liberal- minded area and have often been offended by the profane hatred espoused by my neighbors for President Bush and his administration, even when they are aware that not everyone in the room shares their feelings, and don't seem to care how ignorant they come across. However, when President Clinton was busy soiling his office, all I heard was "so what", "no biggie". Where was their outrage then? What else can one conclude other than they have flawed values?
Mark as offensive

cbargarjr

Definition: Liberals Those who resort to name-calling and profanity when they cannot win an argument with logical and coherent thought.
Mark as offensive

doublehook

You have simply answered the question that conservatives have known for years. Liberals live in frustration, suffer inarticulate lives and depend upon the press to speak and fend for them. No, I am not a learned person and certainly do not possess the vocabulary of a Buckley. I do however have an open mind to continued learning, I read and I can form my own opinions because of my reading and limited education. I am not a mouth like Bewhore(sp?) of The View(sounds NY elitist and absent from the rest of the country). I did like Spock for his logic. I do not have the need for the Carlin seven, the four letter words, mother is spelled and pronounced with an 'r' and for those in need of a smile, wife is also a four letter word. So, content in my average personna, I remain me.
Mark as offensive

Pendamon

Yeah, I have to chime in and say pretty much the same thing---the left cannot win their arguments with facts or logic so they invariably resort to insults, ad hominem attacks, political correctness fear-mongering, or just plain profanity. Exactly the kind of government you get in leftist regimes around the world---repressive, insulting,fear-inducing,unfair, and tyrannical.
Mark as offensive

BG5150

Unfortunately, you are incorrect when you say "14.6 percent of all pages on the most popular liberal sites have profanity on them..." True, the "quotient" is 14.6 (1.9 / 13 X 100). But to say 14.6% of all pages have profanity is playing with the numbers, pardon the pun, too liberally. If that datum were true, it would mean all pages with a profanity would have to contain only one instance. You would have to actually find the number of pages of the 13 million that had a profanity, instead of just the number of instances, to get a meaningful number.
Mark as offensive

BG5150

And, obviously, the same methodology should be applied to the conservative web pages...
Mark as offensive

spearhead

I mean like....Who didn't know this?
Mark as offensive

bpjam

This is like one of those government studies that confirms that laboratory rats get cancer when you give them nicotine or the TIME magazine headline 'Men and Women Are Different!' The Left has always been more hateful. Consider the last protest (or even 'pride' parade) you saw on TV where the attendees were Right Wingers. Was there any violence, destruction of property, arrests or signs promoting illegal activities or profanity? But you can barely put an illegal immigration march on TV without seeing an effigy of somebody being burned (along with the US flag), a union printed poster starting with the F word or somebody wearing a shirt which has to be blurred out to be shown on TV. It is simply who the Left is. If you are an unhappy person and you blame (insert perceived source of evil here) because (perceived evil) is preventing you from being (choose all that apply: happy, rich, pretty, skinny, attractive, at peace), then you can choose to be a liberal to avoid responsibility for your own actions. And if you would like to claim to care more about (insert dire cause here) than the rest of the people 'in the US', then you can become a liberal to protest the fact that other don't share your views. And you can be sure that you are already a liberal if the cause you are protesting or advocating: 1. Cannot be solved by you or anybody you know. (or is unsolvable or a solution is unnecessary as in 'Global Warming') 2. Is far, far, far larger than your scope of influence (so your lack of action beyond complaining is understandable). 3. Is somewhere on the other side of the world (while you neglect simple problems in your own domicile, neighborhood, city, town, family, etc. 4. Can only be achieved/defeated by wiping out all of those people who disagree with you about said issue/cause. Boy are you libs going to be angry when you read this....
Mark as offensive

CommissionerGordon

No mystery really. You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks. Matthew 12:34
Mark as offensive
‹‹ previous12next ››

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.