The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    KNOTT: Pollin honored as a D.C. treasure

  • Sports

    Jamison lights fire under Wizards

  • Politics

    Uninvited White House guests met Obama in line

  • Sports

    Wife aids Woods after SUV crash

  • National

    Volunteers for drug trials hard to find

  • Business

    Dubai debt crisis rocks U.S., Asia markets

  • World

    Piracy threatens fishermen in Yemen

Home » News » World

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Russia mulls missiles in Belarus to offset U.S.

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

jabez41

Russia feels the same way about US infringement in it's sphere of influence as the US felt about Russian missiles in Cuba. The charade that the missiles are to protect Europe from an attack by Iran is ridiculous to say the least. Iran doesn't have missiles capable of such an attack and would have absolutely no reason to attack Europe. The placing of these missiles is nothing more than an effort to intimidate and isolate Russia. Putin and his protege Medvedev are not about to be intimidated and will respond in kind. Bush appears ready to revivive the good ole days of the cold war.
Mark as offensive

Cobra

"Bush appears ready to revivive the good ole days of the cold war." As a veteran of those "good old days" I say that Russia is bluffing. I was stationed in Germany when President Reagan placed intermediate range missiles in West Germany. The Soviet Union, like Russia today, bitched, moaned, and complained about that too, and look what happened. They bitched, moaned, and complained their way right out of existence. This is nothing more than a bluff. The ambassador is talking about the "possible basing of Iskander missiles, the possible basing of strategic bombers in Belarus" but that would put them in rage of our conventional weapons and that would leave them VERY vulnerable to attack. Russia's military isn't that stupid and they wouldn't risk exposing nuclear forces in this way. As far as their "sphere of influence" goes, that's been shrinking since the fall of the Soviet Union itself, so I don't think that our placement of a missle defence network in Europe is really going to change that much. They sure ain't expanding their "sphere of influence" and rattling their nuclear sword is only going to separate them from western leaning nations, something that will weaken them even further. I won't be surprised if they lose even more aligned countries.
Mark as offensive

jabez41

Cobra much of what you say is likely applicable to the current situation.The main point I wanted to make was the US wants to push Russia further into isolation. The US can see that Russia is again gaining a presence as a strong power on the world stage and likely feels uncomfortable at the prospect. Going back to the "good old days" of the cold war, when the USSR removed it's missiles from Cuba a sidebar to the agreement was the US removed their's fom Turkey. The installation of missiles in Cuba was in response to the Soviet Union being encircled by American bases in Europe. I would hesitate to take threats fom Putin-Medvedev lightly. Putin craves a position of military strength and world recognition and will go to great ends to achieve it. Beware the Russian bear should he fell cornered. The crux of the matter is the misssiles are designed to protect Europe from Iranian attack which seems to be a very unlikely possibility.The only possible motive for their installation is to try to imntimidate and further isolate Russia. Putin is smarting over the infringement of the USA on what was formerly a sphere of influence for the Soviet Union, a sphere he wishes to re-establish. Preventing this appears to be the only reason for US missile bases in the Poland Checz republic area.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  3. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  4. Wife aids Woods after SUV crash
  5. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
More Top Stories »
  1. In tobacco-loving Virginia, bars give up the habit
  2. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  3. Robotic hamster holiday craze
  4. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  5. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  4. University bubble bursting?
  5. In tobacco-loving Virginia, bars give up the habit
More Top Stories »
  1. Robotic hamster holiday craze
  2. We ain't seen nothing yet
  3. The United Socialist States of America
  4. Dubai debt crisis rocks U.S., Asia markets
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  4. Crashers probe may become criminal investigation
  5. Ads add heat to health care debate
More Top Stories »
  1. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  3. Grayson's Senate filibuster petition faulted
  4. Health, climate bills seen to stifle hiring
  5. University bubble bursting?

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Are you planning to go shopping today?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Gray staying put

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.