The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion takes driver's seat in debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Democracy a struggle in former Soviet Union

  • Politics

    Roadblock to greet health bill in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » Opinion

Thursday, August 14, 2008

RAHN: Oil and oily politicians

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

JDD

What is one to infer when the speaker of the house has a stake in an alternate energy scheme predicated on high oil prices? What do you infer when that same person puts the congress on a five week VACATION and refuses a floor vote on domestic oil production? How do YOU define "self-serving hypocrite"?
Mark as offensive

soxconn

The most critical national security issue facing the United States is energy independence and the Democrats in Congress and Obama have an energy plan that is an environmental plan and does not produce any additional energy supplies. The infrastructure is not in place for alternative sources and the technology is not there to even meet current demands much less increased demands. They have however passed legislation that has increased minimum wage over the price of a tank of gas, just barely.
Mark as offensive

soxconn

Correction, the price of a gallon of gas.
Mark as offensive

gommygoomy

So WHY don't the DEMOCRATS want to get OUR OWN Energy out of the ground? Can anyone answer that? Anyone. They know that the price of Energy effects the price of EVERYTHING ELSE. Yet they do NOTHING. They PREVENT us from retrieving, what is OURS. The AMERICAN PEOPLE own tht oil and gas. NOT the Congress. And certainly not ONE particular political party. So why do they stand in the way? EVERYONE else, all around the world, use the naturel recources at their disposal. Except us. The Canadians are taking the oil sands out of the ground and SELLING IT to us. Is THEIR ENVIRONMENT in RUINS? Has their Eco System collapsed? Then what's the problem with Pelosi and Reid? There HAS to be a reason for them standing in the way. They like to point to Canada, for its' Health Care. Let them look to Canada for their Energy Extraction Record. There's definately something going on. The American People had better WAKE UP. The Democrats are PLAYING A GAME with OUR LIVES. EVERYTHING COSTS MORE, because of them. You disagree? Than answer my question. Why can't we get our own energy resources out of the ground? Everyone else is.
Mark as offensive

Tmas

It taints the argument to say that Pelosi wants to help her company more than the American people. Her investment in alternative fuels is not the reason she opposes drilling -- both of these facts are consequences of her ideology (which one could disagree with). Real wisdom right now is to be doing everything - oil, alternative fuels, your grandma's kitchen sink, etc. It is unfortunate that such an "everything" plan is stifled by the fact that even Congress doesn't trust its ability to move. One articulation of a bad dream that Nancy Pelosi might have is that we institute the "everything" plan starting with domestic oil production. The price of oil drops in anticipation of more supplies, and the nation loses its resolve to build the infrastructure and market for alternative fuels. If the global warming alarmists are right, then this is obviously a problem because we will be without the needed infrastructure to lower GHG emissions. [This next point should be a fear of everyone's that we all need to watch out for] Also, if the nation loses its resolve and keeps its autos dependent on oil, then our economy will be at the mercy of Islamists who purposely attack oil infrastructure, withhold production, and threaten disruptions/boycotts. The best way to get domestic production through Congress is allay the fear that the nation will stop its push once prices go down. The best way to do that is to support an Open Fuel Standard - that new cars are mandated to be Flex Fuel. A push toward flex fuel plug-in hybrids like this would guarantee a market for alternative fuels to come to market. Then, there would be no threat of inaction on alternative fuels, and prudence would rule the day.
Mark as offensive

skorrent

Tmas- It seems like the best way to get production through Congress is to hang on until Oct 1. The restrictions on OCS and shale drilling expire, and we're left with only the current regulations and taxes. At least we would not then be increasing taxes on the companies we expect to do the drilling, we would not be adding new lawers of environmental regulations to gum things up, and we would not be spending $80 billion + in new taxpayer giveaways to favored companies. Often the hardest thing for Congress to do is to do nothing.
Mark as offensive

pfb32765

The wicked witch of the west from sanctuary city (Pelosi) is totally irrespnsible and may even be corrupt. Her refusal to hold a vote on domestic drilling for more oil that would provide relief to all Americans is despicable. Could the fact that she stands to profit from higher gas prices be her motivation? Check Michelle Malkin's revelation of Pelosi's energy investments. Nancy is beyond contempt. I'm waiting for the mainstream media to report on this but I don't hold out much hope.
Mark as offensive

fredmertz

why would crooked nancy want to drill when she can make millions from her under the table deals with "wind" farms ie: T-Bones deal.
Mark as offensive

RDH

Rhan is quite correct in his assessment of what it takes to get resources to the market place. In the 70's I worked on fields in Ohio and Tenneesee and we could drill and complete a well in as little as a few weeks. If a well produced oil we dropped a pump-jack in place and brought in tanks and pumped the oil to the tanks. A purchasing company would come in and drain the tanks and take the oil to a refinery. We even used "alternative" energy to run the pump jacks on many wells that produced both oil and gas by swapping out the carb on the engine for a natural gas carb (many wells were no where near a power line which would allow us to use electric motors and besides even if electricity was available if you have gas you run your pumps for "free" using the gas from the well). For gas wells the result is a bit different as we had to lay the pipe lines, install the separators and the compressors too. Still we brought a gas field in Tenneesee to production in well under a year. All this talk of "ten years" comes from those that apparently have little knowledge of what they speak.
Mark as offensive

Tmas

Skorrent - The Democrats do have something to teach. If we do overcome their opposition and succeed in domestic oil production, it is still important to see it as mitigation and not the long-term answer to all of our energy woes. Arguing the domestic production point in the context of a broader energy plan will not only help it get through Congress, but it will help to keep our heads on straight. Nanci Pelosi and her personal issues aside, it is important to learn a lesson from whoever is offering one - even if you disagree with their prescriptions.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  5. Israelis unsure of U.S. support

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.