The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody

  • Politics

    Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

  • National

    Poll finds stubborn suspicion of census

  • National

    PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone

  • National

    Blockbuster chain mulls bankruptcy

  • Politics

    Bachmann: Pelosi has 'eternity' to get votes

Home » News » World

Friday, August 15, 2008

Russian warship notice sought

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Kiev vows to uphold decree

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More World Stories

  • EU members' debt forecasts raise brows
  • Obama delays trip to lobby on health care
  • Iraqi PM keeps lead in election vote count
  • 3 convicted in Auschwitz sign theft

By Svitlana Korenovska

Ukrainian military officials on Thursday vowed to uphold a decree ordering Russia to seek permission to move its Black Sea warships based in the Ukrainian port of Sevastopol, setting up a conflict between Russia and another pro-Western former Soviet republic.

"The president's decrees on the Black Sea fleet will, of course, be implemented on the territory of Ukraine," said Ukrainian Chief of Staff Serhiy Kyrychenko, according to the Unian news agency. "The Defense Ministry and the general staff are among those state bodies responsible for this task."

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko on Wednesday issued the decree, which stated that Russia is required to notify Kiev of its warships' movements within Ukrainian territory at least 72 hours in advance.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Volodymyr Ohryzko said on Thursday that the measures undertaken by the government were an adequate response to a situation in which the Russian military is moving on the territory of Ukraine "as they wish." He noted that Russia has to respect international laws.

That means that Russian ships dispatched to support the military action in Georgia will have to seek Ukrainian authorization to return to the base in Crimea that Moscow leases from Ukraine.

The Russian Foreign Ministry called the move "a serious new anti-Russian step," and the deputy head of the Russian General Staff, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, dismissed the order as illegitimate.

"We have one general commander for the Black Sea fleet. It is the president of Russia," Mr. Nogovitsyn was quoted as saying.

The Russian navy was deployed to the Georgian coast during Russia's military incursion into Georgia in support of breakaway regions South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Ukraine backed Georgia in the dispute. The two countries have pro-Western governments and have been seeking to join the NATO military alliance.

The Georgian conflict has given rise to suggestions that disagreements between Ukraine and Russia could rekindle tension between the two neighbors over the port, which has long been a source of friction.

Ukraine wants the Russian navy out of its country before the $93-million-a-year lease expires in May 2017. Russia has stated that it wants the Black Sea fleet to remain headquartered in Sevastopol, with some Russian nationalists, including local members of parliament, voicing the ideas of reclaiming the port city of Sevastopol from Ukraine.

"Russia has never made a secret of its desire to retain its presence in Sevastopol after 2017," Adm. Vladimir Vysotsky, commander of the Russian navy, said last month.

But analysts say it's unlikely Russia will pursue a military scenario against Ukraine, to which it provides natural gas.

"The trajectory of Russian future pressure on Ukraine is already evident - in the form of increased natural gas prices," said John Daly, a Eurasian foreign affairs and defense policy expert for the Jamestown Foundation. "I think that a military clash is highly unlikely."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. KOFFMAN: A prescription for life or death?
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's medical horror stories
  5. Medical pot lights up D.C. debate
More Top Stories »
  1. CBO feels crush of health care requests
  2. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  4. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  5. Feds defend $450K for art, design shows

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  4. Kucinich will vote for health care reform
  5. CBO feels crush of health care requests
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's medical horror stories
  2. Group condemns textbooks about Islam
  3. Obama dismisses procedural tactics
  4. Price tag in hand, Dems prepare for final health care vote
  5. 'Self-executing rule' decried as a 'trick'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

Weighing the right of free speech against the right to privacy, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on protests at military funerals. What do you think?

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Video - Coburn to House members: We will expose any sweetheart deals for votes

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.