The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at the Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

  • National

    'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

  • Business

    Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

EDITORIAL: Musharraf's resignation

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

vcbhutani

It is sad that an influential paper like Washington Times can write an editorial like this. To put my first reaction tersely and without rancour or sarcasm, America with friends like Musharraf did not need enemies. When Bush spoke after 9/11 and bluntly told Pakistan to make up its mind whether it was with USA or against USA, Musharraf had no choice but to fall in line. He might survive the hostility of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, as in the event he did, but he would certainly not survive the hostility of USA and the West. So he dumped the Taliban and seemingly went along with the war against terror. In this he was playing a double game: run with the hares and hunt with the hounds. He played that role so well that today great US newspapers and Dr Condoleezza Rice are able to heap encomiums of praise on Musharraf: nothing could be farther from the truth. The double game was that while he gave the appearance of fighting against the Taliban, he allowed ISI operatives to go on extending cooperation to the Taliban in Afghanistan; this is now certified by US commanders in Afghanistan. In the upshot, whenever US and allied forces came close to grabbing or killing Osama bin Laden, he was informed well in advance, obviously by ISI operatives who operated equally obviously with Musharraf's approval. Isaf strikes against Osama &c. never achieved their objectives. To the extent he cooperated with US and allied forces, he incurred the wrath of the Taliban and other extremists, who launched four assassination attempts on him that failed and one on Benazir Bhutto that succeeded. Altogether, it is inaccurate to say that he was a willing partner in the war against terror. Facts, especially recent testimony of US commanders in Afghanistan, seem to point in the opposite direction. That this brought Pakistan $10 billion is a fact of the case: it is also a fact that all of that money has not been certified by US audit to have been used for the purpose for which it was given - vide US reports appearing in US newspapers, passim. The US administration - and certainly its leading lights Bush, Cheney, Rice and Gates - went so far to humour and accommodate Musharraf that it approved the handing over of F-16s to Pakistan and refurbishing of older aircraft, all of which could not be used in the war against terror but only in a possible war against India. This naturally caused disquiet in India. Now that Musharraf is gone, the US administration should at least begin to see things for what they were. If they go on insisting that Pakistan played a sterling role in the war against terror, then US objectives in the war against terror are unlikely ever to be achieved. We know in any case that Osama continues to roam free although Bush wanted him dead or alive. V. C. Bhutani, Delhi August 19 2008 0830 IST vineycb1@vsnl.com
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college
More Top Stories »
  1. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  2. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  3. The enemy at home
  4. After the Berlin Wall: German unity proves elusive
  5. Patent case goes to Supreme Court

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  5. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  3. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  4. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  5. The enemy at home

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.