Infidelity thins convention ranks

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Jennifer Harper

Call girls, little white lies, big fat fibs, wavering loyalties, wincing spouses, unfortunate remarks, questionable use of campaign funds and, yes, one possible love child.

A newly realized culture of seduction has cast a potential pall over the Democratic convention this week and diminished the role of certain party luminaries and up-and-comers who could have had starring roles at the podium.

Their passions clouded their reputations, at least temporarily, and it happened only two years after Democrats captured control of Congress from a scandal-scarred GOP it blasted for promoting a "culture of corruption" on Capitol Hill.

The Democratic convention has billed itself to be green, all-American and diverse. But it's not necessarily forgiving.

There is a roster of rejects expected to be absent from the proceedings, which begin in a matter of hours. Former presidential hopeful John Edwards won't be there. Neither will former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa - all passed up for a pivotal moment before tens of thousands of Democratic loyalists after their sexual dalliances became public.

"A silver lining in these scandals is that infidelity is still scandalous. This shows that all the efforts to discount Bill Clinton's cheating as 'just sex' didn't change the national perception - or even Democrats' - that fidelity matters," said Wendy Wright, president of the Concerned Women for America.

"Infidelity - sexual or financial - carries national security risks, making a politician vulnerable to blackmail or criminal behavior to cover up his actions. But it also betrays a lack of character and good judgment, that he is willing to sacrifice everything that matters, even people who depend on him, for something not nearly as important," she added.

Yet in a troubled post-911, post-Monica Lewinsky world, does yet another story about yet another unfaithful politician still resonate with the public? Some think not.

"There are two trend lines that would indicate these concerns will not be a factor. One, the anxiety level in the public is so deep and serious right now that some of the trivial, sensational issues are not going to have the impact they had in the past," said Democratic consultant Dan Gerstein.

"The second thing is that it's a mistake to think the public only sees imperfection and failings of just the other side. Both parties have their share of peccadilloes. For every Eliott Spitzer and John Edwards, there's a Larry Craig or a Mark Foley," Mr. Gerstein said.