- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Lieberman skeptical of Obama drilling stance
Question of the Day
Sen. Joe Lieberman said Sunday that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama’s decision to embrace limited offshore drilling was halfhearted and loaded with caveats and he predicted the senator from Illinois would find a reason to change his position again if he had to vote on the issue.
Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi agreed with Mr. Obama’s stance that some offshore drilling could beon the table as part of a broader energy bill.
“What Senator Obama said is what we want a president to say,” Mrs. Pelosi said on “This Week” on ABC. “Let’s look at all of the options. Let’s compare them. And let’s see what really does increase our supply, protect our environment, save our economy, protect the consumer, instead of a single-shot thing that does none of the above.”
The California Democrat would not elaborate when moderator George Stephanopoulos pressed for details, beyond saying, “You never say never to anything.”
But she is adamant against a vote on a stand-alone bill for allowing increased offshore drillingand dismissed proposed exploration and development asan effort to “to mislead the American people as to thinking it’s going to reduce the price at the pump.”
“From my standpoint, my flagship issue as speaker of the House in this 110th Congress has been to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” she said.
Mr. Lieberman, a Connecticut independent and a surrogate for Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona, said he was skeptical of Mr. Obama’s support of a proposal from a bipartisan group of 10 senators that Friday proposed a compromise energy plan that included drilling in areas currently off limits, renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power and nuclear energy.
“John McCain sees the crisis,” Mr. Lieberman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Barack Obama says this weekend, ‘maybe,’ ‘eh,’ ‘and,’ ‘if,’ ‘but.’ He did not endorse, he did not come out with a strong decision.
“I predict to you he’ll find reasons not to be for it if this comes to a vote in the Senate,” said Mr. Lieberman, an ex-Democrat who formerly opposed expanded offshore drilling.
Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, who appeared with Mr. Lieberman, accused his Senate colleague of distorting Mr. Obama’s position, saying the senator from Illinois remains opposed to drilling but is prepared to “break America’s gridlock by honoring a bipartisan effort, if that is the only way to move us towards alternative and renewable fuels and an energy policy that’s comprehensive.”
Both Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain opposed expanded oil exploration along U.S. coastlines while campaigning for the presidential nomination. But Mr. Obama said Friday he would consider it as part of a comprehensive energy plan that included promoting fuel-efficient cars and developing alternate energy sources.
“My interest is in making sure we’ve got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices,” Mr. Obama said in an interview last week with the Palm Beach (Fla.) Post.
“If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well-thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage, I don’t want to be so rigid that we can’t get something done.”
Mr. McCain also had a change of heart on the issue several weeks ago, and now supports drilling because of spiraling energy costs.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, defended Mr. McCain’s reversal on “Fox News Sunday,” saying that “it’s OK to change your mind in politics if it benefits your country” but that “it’s not OK to break your word.”
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq