The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • NFL

    Same old problems plague Redskins

  • Politics

    Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

  • Security

    Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers

  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

Home » Blogs

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Nuclear, biological terrorist attack likely

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

RDH

Well there we have it. Obama has been warned. If any attack occurs, it is totally his fault.
Mark as offensive

fredmertz

at least when new york or washington DC is a smoking pile they'll be glad we have "THE ONE " in charge instead of the evil Bush
Mark as offensive

gatlingung6

Here we go again. Another commission pointing to the same old suspects, Iran, North Korea, and why not throw in Syria as well. I'm still waiting for someone to show me specifically what article of the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty is Iran violating. As a treaty signatory, doesn't Iran have an absolute right to develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes? Where is the solid proof that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon? Western intelligence and other entities have studied Iranian intentions from afar for over a quarter of a century, and with what results? Well with these conclusions: The years and periods of 1984, 2000, 2003, 2005-2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2016 are all years when Iran was supposed to have had or will have the bomb. Throwing darts could have equaled these conclusions. So what's missing from all these well prepared estimates? That's easy:Intent and power, what are Iranian intentions, and who has the power to order it done. The first missing factor involves what's in someone's mind, and the second is: in whose mind. Listening to a bunch of expats with ulterior motives who have not lived in Iran for years does not get you to intent or power, nor do eyes in the sky. Are we going to accept that Iran is developing nuclear weapons as a fact like some of us foolishly accepted Iraq's WMD claim? Oddly enough the Commission concludes the attack will most likely be with biological weapons, yet they present not one iota of evidence that Korea, or Iran is involved in bio weapons. Besides that, where was all this wisdom when they were members of Congress. Btw fredmerzt when will you admit that President Bush will go down in history as one of the most intellectually lazy, incurious, inarticulate, inept, divisive and incompetent President ever. That's a tragedy that no one should be happy to see. Once we drop the stupid don't talk to, or have relations with enemies just maybe we will get closer to an answer than guessing. There's no logic to the don't talk policy. If you are not talking with your mouth, your only alternative is talking with weapons. Oops I gave away the secret, that's what the neocrazies want more war.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  2. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
  3. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Furious scramble for health reform support
  4. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  2. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. Israelis unsure of U.S. support

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.