- The Washington Times - Monday, December 8, 2008

There was no exhaustive coverage of the O.J. Simpson trial this time.

There was no cheering or jeering along racial lines following the conviction and sentencing of Simpson.

There was mostly indifference to Simpson, whose acquittal in the murders of ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman produced antithetical reactions in white and black America 13 years ago.

That was the Simpson who was said to symbolize the racial divide.


This was the irrelevant Simpson who symbolized nothing, the Simpson who no longer mattered, the Simpson who frittered it all away: the money, the social status and finally his freedom.

His inexorable fall became complete in a Las Vegas courtroom last week when a judge sentenced the former football star, pitchman and broadcaster to 33 years in prison for his role in a bizarre robbery last year involving two sports memorabilia dealers who, Simpson claimed, had stolen personal items from him.

Simpson, pending his appeal, will not be eligible for parole until serving at least nine years of his sentence.

It is possible the penalty is a life sentence for Simpson, who is 61 years old. It is possible he never will step foot on a golf course again. It is possible his last home will be a 78-square-foot cell in the Nevada desert.

If so, more than a few might claim that it is an appropriate end for someone who seemingly beat the system and then mocked it, most blatantly with his decision to pen a book in 2006 titled “If I Did It.”

Fred Goldman, the father who lost a son in horrific fashion, took a measure of solace in the sentencing.

“It was satisfying seeing him in shackles like he belongs,” he said.

We probably will never know what prompted Simpson to think it was a good idea to play the heavy with five buddies, even if, as he claimed, the items were rightfully his.

Given his past, Simpson should have thought it unwise to jaywalk anywhere in America.

But perhaps Simpson thought he could dodge the laws that govern the rest of us. Perhaps he thought his celebrity would mesmerize another jury.

In a rambling speech to the judge, he apologized for his actions but still insisted he had done no wrong.

Story Continues →