Subscribe to this story's comments
Firstly, I have to agree with most of the points in this article because they're accurate and almost undeniable. Zimbabwe is now in huge trouble while Mugabe is a total disaster in this case.
However, in the later part Mr. Larson seems to have his solution too simple, violent and actually, from complete Western perspectives. Isn't a so-called "cyber-assasination" or using the force of western power also called rude from either normal or international politics?
Earlier in the security council a motion of censuring Mugabe just failed because of some countries think of it a sovereign intrusion - and I personally agree this is an issue that at least should let the African people decide, not westerns.
But above all, I think it's an insightful and mostly correct article. But I won't totally agree with everything it reads.
Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!








