The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • NFL

    Same old problems plague Redskins

  • Politics

    Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

  • Security

    Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers

  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Groups spend millions in 'clean coal' ad war

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Industry stands to lose big under new pollution standards

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

blackwatch

Environmentalists have abbetted China in their building Coal Power plants, one per week for years now, with no pollution abatement technology requirement - period. They wrote that into the Kyoto laws and then excoriated the USA government for not signing onto their legislation. (more to come)
Mark as offensive

blackwatch

Environmentalists now have launched an "appeal" to the American voter that bases their critique of Clean Coal technology on the agreed nascent status of Carbon Sequestration technology (CST)as a part of a larger conspiracy against the folks. They further seek to define "Clean Coal" as ONLY being composed of CST and ignore the role of Scrubber Technology contribution to effluent clean-up - which is + 98% effective on Coal smokestack pollution. (more to come).
Mark as offensive

blackwatch

The Environmental movement is, essentially, a Luddite movement that will drive the economy over a cliff with "Chicken little - like" arguments-of-the day, geared to rouse the ire of the uneducated masses. The Environmentalists that have taken a few decades to educate themselves to actually understand the situation are now (The founder of Greenpeace in Europe) in favor of Nukes as the "greenest" carbon free energy alternative. This is a position that represents a complete, 180 degree, turnaround from the earlier (1970's era)Greenpeace position. (more to come)
Mark as offensive

blackwatch

The real question is "do you really trust that these self proclaimed expert "progressive" Luddites can provide a solution to supplying adequate energy supplies while contributing zero emmisions ?". If you do, I have a large house in Tennessee that uses massive amounts of energy I'd like to sell you, along with a private jet, now owned by a previous, now equally large assed, presidential office seeker with a Nobel prize on his fireplace mantle....
Mark as offensive

blackwatch

Oh...one more thing.. The article cites a 5.88% re-investment of profit ($1 of every $17) plowed back into R&D investment. As 10% of profit is a norm for R&D, a figure of almost 60% of your entire R&D expenditure - on a single (CST) technology - is actually very high. See what I mean ? these folks are essentially one-world government socialists that are trying to whip "the proletariat" into a frenzy so that, utimately, Al Gore and company can profit. In the end, they really don't give a "rat's patootie" for you or the real environmental issues. Those issues are boring, unless they can make a ton of money and be hailed as saviours in the process of taking over your lives. Get it ??
Mark as offensive

JSellers0

So the Coal Industry isn't trying to brainwash people in order to establish a government more partial to them and, in the end, rake in the profits? Come on. "These folks" are not all in it for profit margins and draconian law. I agree that some probably are, but the vast majority are people who see alternatives to an outdated technology. Until coal can be "extracted" (though I think harvested is a much better term to aim for) without ripping the tops off of mountains and depositing them in the valleys below, without setting up sludge lakes that eventually collapse and kill hundreds of people, and used without creating unnecessary pollution and waste, it is simply an outright lie to call it "clean."
Mark as offensive

ntcdmd1

if you believe in global warming you have s--- for brains
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  5. Israelis unsure of U.S. support

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Furious scramble for health reform support
  4. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  2. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.