- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Shinseki garners plaudits, doubts
Question of the Day
Democrats and some veterans groups are praising President-elect Barack Obama’s selection of retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki to head the troubled Department of Veterans Affairs, but others are quietly questioning his qualifications to lead the Cabinet agency that is largely in charge of military retirees’ health care.
The former Army chief of staff and four-star general will bring new energy and new hope to millions of veterans, said Bob Filner, California Democrat and chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee. Mr. Filner also outlined some of the expectations and challenges the new VA chief faces.
“The stakes are high at the Department of Veterans Affairs,” Mr. Filner said. “Our veterans need to know that their service to our country is respected and honored. A new basis of stable funding must be developed. The claims backlog must be attacked in a new and dynamic way. And the mental health of our veterans - from every conflict and each generation - must remain a high priority.”
John Rowan, national president of Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA), echoed Mr. Filner’s praise and called the nomination “a promising choice.”
“We have no doubt that General Shinseki has the integrity and personal fortitude to usher in the real changes needed to make the VA a true steward of our nation’s veterans and their families,” Mr. Rowan said. “His selection certainly lives up to Mr. Obama’s promise to bring change and hope to Washington. VA bureaucrats, for whom ‘change’ is a dirty word, will learn that there really is a new game in town. Veterans of all political persuasions should take heart and applaud this choice.”
Glen M. Gardner Jr., national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, also praised Gen. Shinseki but noted the different requirements for heading a Cabinet agency, particularly one as troubled as Veterans Affairs.
“Running the VA will be far different than leading troops into battle,” said Mr. Gardner, who leads the nation’s largest organization of combat veterans. “But we hope he possesses the leadership, management and accountability traits that we demand from all VA secretaries.”
The VA provides benefits, social and economic programs as well as health care to nearly 25 million veterans, but was plagued by controversy this year over a growing number of backlogged disability claims, a rise in the number of suicide attempts, and clinical testing on vulnerable veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.
One high-ranking retired officer who asked to remain anonymous questioned Gen. Shinseki’s record on veterans health-care issues.
“How much time has he spent visiting the PTSD wards, the multiple-amputee wards, the burn wards? The major question I have is: Just what has he done for the past five years to show any concern for our veterans? I do not see any evidence of Shinseki being an agent for change.”
Gen. Shinseki angered many in the military with his plan to have all Army soldiers wear black berets, an honor previously reserved for elite forces. After a backlash began, it was revealed that the needed extra berets would be made in China and other foreign countries, a detail Gen. Shinseki said he didn’t know until after the contract was signed.
Gen. Shinseki also clashed with Pentagon civilians, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, in the run-up to the Iraq war, telling the Senate Armed Services Committee on Feb. 25, 2003, that “several hundred thousand soldiers” would be needed to control that country after a U.S. invasion.
When NBC interviewer Tom Brokaw pointed out the remark to Mr. Obama on Saturday, the president-elect responded that the four-star general “was right.”
A smaller troop increase than what Gen. Shinseki said was needed plus a change in tactics in President Bush’s 2007 “surge” have been credited with calming sectarian bloodletting in Iraq. Mr. Obama opposed the troop surge in the Senate, saying it actually would make sectarian violence worse.
It has been widely reported that Gen. Shinseki’s remarks forced him into retirement. He did retire several months later, on June 11.
About the Author
this is a bio
- Flight security stiffened after failed plot
- Alleged terrorist charged with attempt to explode plane
- Airlines told to limit plane's time on tarmac
- Government imposes 3-hour limit on tarmac strandings
- Millions spent on security retreats
Latest Blog Entries
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring 'God's Rescue Squad'
- WEST: Those who would rather join the jihadi army than their own nation's army
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq