The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > National

School accepts transgender child

By | Monday, February 18, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

HIGHLANDS RANCH, Colo. — He's an 8-year-old boy who wants to attend second grade here in the Douglas County Public Schools, but with an unusual stipulation: He wants to go to class as a girl.

That means wearing girls' clothing if he likes, being addressed by his teacher with a girl's name, and using the school's two unisex, family bathrooms instead of the boys' room.

School district officials are preparing to accommodate the transgender child and his family, but not without public fuss.

Other parents at the school have gone public with their objections, citing concerns about exposing their own children to the sensitive subjects of sex and gender identification, and questioning the wisdom of the school's accommodation of the boy.

"I don't think a [second-grader] does have the rationale to decide this life-altering choice," said Dave M., who told Denver's KUSA-TV that his daughter will be in the same class as the transgendered boy.

Another dozen or so parents have sent concerned e-mails to the school district, said schools spokeswoman Whei Wong. More e-mails have arrived from out of state as word of the situation spreads on the blogosphere, notably via conservative and Christian Web sites.

The district isn't releasing the name of the family or the elementary school in order to protect the child. The student attended the elementary school in kindergarten and first grade, but then left for another school district, Ms. Wong said.

She declined to say when exactly the student will re-enroll, but stressed that the district is obligated to provide an education to all students, no matter what their situation.

"We want the student to have a positive learning environment because if the student is distracted, they can't learn," Ms. Wong said.

Families with questions about the school's response are being directed to the principal. The school also compiled a packet of information about transgendered children that is available to parents upon request, she said.

On the Americans for Truth Web site, group President Peter LaBarbera criticized the district for teaching other children that identifying as a member of the opposite sex is acceptable behavior.

"What does this kid know? He's eight," said Mr. LaBarbera. "When you allow abnormal behavior, it's like you're telegraphing to other kids that aberrant behavior is okay, that it's normal. So the school is imprinting in all these kids' minds this gender confusion."

Such responses have transgender advocates worried about the child's safety. Kim Pearson, a Wisconsin-based advocate who has worked with the Colorado family, said she fears the publicity could create a dangerous environment for the child.

"I'm anxious to see how things play out, and I'm holding my breath that this kid and the family are going to be safe," said Mrs. Pearson, executive director of TransYouth Family Advocates.

She said her organization works with children as young as five, and cited the American Academy of Pediatrics as saying that sexual identity is formed between the ages of 3 and 5.

"Until a child like this gets this piece of the puzzle in place, they can't learn, they can't get an education, they can't form relationships with other people," said Mrs. Pearson, whose 15-year-old daughter identifies as a boy.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. Recession tea leaves 'misread'
  8. Chaos theory -- and practice
  9. Young Cons a YouTube surprise hit
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Missed opportunities doom Nats, Stammen

Space-defense systems secure in glass house

American Scene

Stimulus program puts teens to work

Nation Briefs

Lawyer seeks 12 year prison term for Madoff

Easter on her door leads to eviction

Tight budgets mean less bang for July 4 bashes

Rapids beat United 3-0

Managing to improve

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.