The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

  • Security

    Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers

  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Rocket science reprieve

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Commentary Stories

  • Democrats sent reeling
  • BOOK REVIEW: Saudi life seen in wider context
  • Close the verification gap
  • A great day for liberty

By

The U.S. Navy missile streaked to an altitude of 133 nautical miles and slammed into a dying spy satellite traveling at 17,000 miles per hour with 1,000 pounds of deadly hydrazine fuel aboard. Various sensors on land, sea and in space noted the explosion. Initial reports said the satellite had been turned into what military analyst John Pike called "gravel."

The ever-cautious U.S. military said we needed to take a deep breath and await complete computer analysis. The international news media erupted into an explanation of altitude, velocity, weight, payload, target angle and other details. But I could only think of one man: Ronald Reagan.

On March 23, 1983, President Reagan announced from the Oval Office: "I've reached a decision which offers a new hope for our children in the 21st century." He explained his vision — and his defense budget's inclusion — of the first funds to go toward this nation's missile defense effort.

Liberals, and most of the media, derided the president's project as "star wars." Since 1983, America's Missile Defense effort has become a multinational, multi-system effort: it has reached into space and it has come down to Earth and the sea.

Before President Reagan's "new hope" the national military strategy of the United States and the Soviet Union contained an unwavering commitment to "Mutually Assured Destruction."

Mutually Assured Destruction meant just one American or Soviet nuclear weapon-armed intercontinental ballistic missile headed toward the adversary would result in a violent and unstoppable response of hundreds and perhaps thousands of nuclear warheads. Millions would die in the exchange. The strategy became know as "MAD."

Ronald Reagan, when briefed on emerging U.S. technology for missiles, sensors, lasers and other efforts, saw the future. He saw a new hope for our children and he committed himself — and his nation — to achieving that vision.

Ronald Reagan is gone. Many of the initial advisers, technologists and engineers have passed away. In Congress, the missile defense issue has been argued every year — and usually funding has been less than requested by the Pentagon.

Still, countless hundreds of thousands of people: engineers, technologists, scientists, soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines have continued the project, largely without complaint — continued to pursue President Reagan's new hope and vision.

The U.S. Navy missile that slammed into the dead satellite, USA 193, was a product of those decades of effort. The modifications to the ship that launched that missile and the training absorbed by those wonderful sailors — products of an American youth criticized by their elders for their frivolous and careless ways — who carried out this mission all grew from President Ronald Reagan's vision.

Today, the Soviet Union no longer exists. But the threat posed by missile-launched weapons of mass destruction — nuclear, chemical and biological weapons — clearly still exists. Russia still has a robust nuclear and missile arsenal. Add to that China. North Korea has demonstrated advancing missile and nuclear weapon technology. Pakistan and India have nuclear arsenals and long-range missiles. Iran has long-range missiles and the United Nations argues over how far Iran has advanced its nuclear weapon efforts. Terrorists have boasted they will have nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction that can soon wipe out Israel and threaten Europe and the U.S.

Missile defense, the vision of Ronald Reagan and source of America's ability to destroy a potentially dangerous satellite, remains viable, important and necessary.

We hear a lot about the economy, health care and other domestic issues. No domestic programs count unless the nation can be defended.

We haven't heard much about missile defense or other defense and international efforts in the current presidential campaigns but given the current state of affairs in the world, maybe we should.

John E. Carey is a former senior military officer who served in President Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) and is president of International Defense Consultants, Inc.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
  2. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. House OKs health reform bill

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  2. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint
  3. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  4. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama urges House to pass health care bill

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Campbell, M. Williams have bad ankles

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.