- Israel poised for a $173M boost from the U.S. for missile defense
- Leon Panetta named as source of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ scriptwriter’s information
- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
- Brooklyn, N.Y.: ‘Lesbian capital’ of the Northeast
- Elian Gonzalez: It’s America’s fault that my mother died
- India top court rules homosexuality is illegal
- Aaron Hernandez, ex-Patriot, on prison life: ‘I’m way less stressed in jail’
U.S., Iraq to discuss relations
U.S. and Iraqi negotiators will begin meeting later this month and hope to conclude a strategic compact on long-term economic, political and military cooperation by midsummer, Iraq’s U.S. ambassador said yesterday.
Ambassador Samir Sumaida’ie, briefing a small group of reporters at Iraq’s new Washington embassy, said the proposed agreement would not endorse permanent U.S. military bases in his country or “tie the hands” of future U.S. or Iraqi leaders over the size or the mission of American forces in Iraq.
“Like any agreement, this can be terminated,” Mr. Sumaida’ie said. “But we believe it is very much in our national interest to forge a long-term relationship with the United States and make Iraq an ally of the U.S.”
“We also believe that any future American president would see the benefits to the U.S. national interest of keeping an alliance with Iraq,” he added.
The strategic agreement, building on a “Declaration of Principles” signed in November by President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, has sparked sharp debate in Congress.
Democratic critics charge the agreement is a bid to lock Mr. Bush’s Iraq policies in place long after he leaves office next year.
“The president is on notice. He cannot do this unilaterally,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said late last month.
The Bush-al-Maliki principles include a pledge to protect Iraq from “internal or external” threats, which opponents say could commit U.S. forces to taking sides in an Iraqi civil war and remaining in the country indefinitely.
Administration officials insist the agreement will not establish permanent U.S. bases in Iraq or set troop levels. It will set the rules and rights for U.S. military and civilian personnel operating in Iraq, which are now covered by a U.N. authorization set to expire at the end of the year.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates described the accord as a way to “normalize” bilateral ties. Administration officials say the agreement will resemble dozens of “status of forces” agreements, known as SOFAs, that the U.S. military has negotiated with countries around the world where American troops operate.
The administration said lawmakers will be consulted on the negotiations but has not promised to submit the final text for congressional approval.
Mr. Sumaida’ie said most Iraqis accept the need for foreign troops to help fight al Qaeda and insurgent forces for now.
“We cannot now suddenly have those forces pull out. It would create a vacuum in security we would be unable to fulfill,” he said.
But he said Iraq would press for much tighter controls and oversight on the activities of private-security contractors, such as Blackwater USA, which have been involved in a number of incidents in which Iraqi civilians have been killed.
“Private-security companies should not be exempt from the discussions,” he said. “We want them to be accountable. Immunity for us is unacceptable and it should be unacceptable to the U.S. side as well.”
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Obama hits new poll lows for approval 38 percent
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- LAMBRO: The dark lining to the silver cloud of Obamanomics
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Helping the YOUniverse conspire on your behalf.
A column dedicated to discussing politics, national security, civil liberties, and education.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow