- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
Court questions voter-ID critics
Question of the Day
The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday questioned the need to strike down Indiana’s voter-ID law — the strictest in the country and, if upheld, a likely watershed for other states to require photo identification at the ballot box.
“You want us to invalidate a statute on the ground that it’s a minor inconvenience to a small percentage of voters?” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said during oral arguments.
The Indiana Democratic Party and civil rights groups challenged the law as an unconstitutional assault on voting rights. They characterize the photo-ID requirement as a Republican scheme to disenfranchise minorities, the poor and elderly, who are most likely to lack a driver’s license and who also tend to vote Democratic.
Republicans say the law — the only one in the country to require a birth certificate to get a state-issued ID needed to vote — guards against voter fraud.
Proponents say it helps thwart voting by people from out of state, felons and illegal aliens, as well as safeguards voting rolls that are rarely purged of duplicate entries and dead voters.
The White House supports the law, which was passed by Indiana’s Republican-led General Assembly and signed by Gov.Mitch Daniels, a Republican.
As many as 20 states are lined up to adopt similar photo-ID laws for voting if Indiana’s survives the Supreme Court test. A decision is expected in June, in time for the presidential election in November.
A handful of states require some identification to vote, but only Georgia and Indiana have photo-ID mandates that do not allow the substitution of a signed affidavit or other documents, and only Indiana has the birth-certificate standard.
“Those Indiana voters who lack the identification now required by the new photo-ID law must overcome substantial practical and financial burdens before they can continue to exercise their constitutional right,” Mr. Smith said.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. later challenged Mr. Smith’s argument that there was scant evidence of the type of fraud the law purports to fight.
“You said it serves no purpose. What if we determine that it does serve a purpose in preventing fraud?” Justice Roberts said. “How are we supposed to weigh that against your asserted burden on the right to vote?”
Mr. Smith replied: “Well, you have to make some judgment about the incremental, additional benefit above what’s already been in place for decades, and it worked extremely effectively. … It seems to me you have to say: Is there any real benefit here compared to these burdens?”
Justice Antonin Scalia, who had earlier posed sharp questions for Mr. Smith, joined the exchange.
“Well, if you want to talk about increments, why shouldn’t we also ask whether our judgment does more harm than good, whether the remedy for the inconvenience to a small number of people is to wash away the whole statute, which in most of its applications is perfectly OK?” he said.
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq