Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Something lost

Years ago, near the end of the semester, some college professors enjoyed handing out to their students a mock examination called “The Ultimate Final.”

The test called for responses to absurdly over-the-top essay topics covering every academic discipline, such as:

“Astronomy: Define the universe, and give two examples.”

“History: Estimate the impact of human life.”

Ridiculous as it sounds, those last two “assignments” are what come to mind, as I contemplate the 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision.

Granted, it is not what most people will remember. Jan. 22 marks a sobering occasion, one that inevitably will be drenched in a flood of staggering statistics. About 48 million babies killed, for instance — more, across these 3½ decades, than the entire population of Canada. Or of California, Oregon and Washington, combined.

But, of course, numbers like that only underscore the horror — they don’t define it. Court-sanctioned abortion would be no less horrific, no less of a stain on American law, no less of a sin against the soul of our nation, if only one unborn baby had died.

That sounds, perhaps, like hyperbole. But, in reality, it’s the essential point of disconnect between those who defend and those who oppose abortion — the philosophical fissure that worms its increasingly unstable path through the moral and legal foundations of our whole society, like some kind of spiritual San Andreas Fault.

For in fact, no one argues against the idea that, in some sense, life is sacred. And no one debates whether lives are important.

But what about a life? One solitary soul. Is that worth fighting for? Dying for? Even if it isn’t your mother’s, your brother’s, your child’s … your own? Do we lose anything — as a society, and as individuals — if we forfeit a life that didn’t have to die? Is life really sacred, if every life isn’t?

That question is at the root of our most divisive, emotional issues, from the proper response to terrorism to stem-cell research to the fight for Terri Schiavo. It cuts to the very essence of the democratic process and its reverence for a single vote … to the heart of the law and its holy defense of civil liberties and “reasonable doubts” … to the deepest soul of a nation founded on “self-evident” truths about “inalienable” rights, not just of a people, but of every individual.

That is what makes court-ordered abortion not only an outrage but a humiliation to our nation. And, after all these years, it’s what makes the statistics, however shocking, ring so hollow in our ears.

Because, in the end, the price of abortion is not how many babies have been killed. That’s only the crime. The cost of that crime, though, is something we all pay, every day, in what might have been.

Suppose, out of all those millions upon millions of unborn children, had come the scientist whose insights could have cured cancer — or AIDS. The teacher who might have inspired your whole life. The visionary leader whose courage and wisdom would have transformed or surmounted the bitter politics of these last few years.

Oh, come on, you say. Let’s not get sentimental. OK, sentiment aside. You really don’t think out of those millions and millions and millions, there was not one single mind and soul whose individual achievements might have ignited some vital corner of our courts … our classrooms … our corporations … our cathedrals?

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Ingredients for Healthy Living

          Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

          Rights So Divine

          Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God