- Michael Bloomberg thumbs FAA ban, plots course to Israel
- California bans full-contact football practices in off-season
- Thune: Downed fighter jets show more evidence of separatist capabilities
- Obama tells DNC fundraising crowd: ‘I’m not overly partisan’
- Chambliss: Downed jet ultimately goes back to Putin
- Perdue strategy: Run against Reid, Obama, Pelosi
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- ‘Operation Normandy’ set to send 3,500 volunteers to border to ‘stop an invasion’
- Netanyahu’s spokesman: Safe to fly to Israel
- Oregon vandals smear cars with doughnuts, pastries, chocolate bars
Debate brings conflict to fore
Question of the Day
The two Democratic presidential candidates locked in a race for enough delegates to win the party nomination stood within arms’ distance confronting each other on issues that before last night had mostly been fought by their campaign staff behind the scenes.
It was a stark contrast from last week’s debate in Las Vegas where the candidates were cordial as they sat around a table.
At times last night, they were shouting over one another, with moderator Wolf Blitzer of CNN attempting to bring the debate back under his control.
“We’re just getting warmed up,” said Mrs. Clinton, of New York.
Mr. Obama, of Illinois, defended himself against charges that he praised Republicans as having better ideas than Democrats, saying Mrs. Clinton was cherry-picking facts to put him in a negative light.
“What she said wasn’t true,” Mr. Obama insisted after she said he hadn’t accounted for how he would pay for some of his programs, including foreign aid.
“This is one of the things that’s happened during the course of this campaign, that there’s a set of assertions made by Senator Clinton, as well as her husband, that are not factually accurate,” he said. “And I think that part of what the people are looking for right now is somebody who’s going to solve problems and not resort to the same typical politics that we’ve seen in Washington.”
“It is sometimes difficult to understand what Senator Obama has said, because as soon as he is confronted on it, he says that’s not what he meant,” she said.
The former first lady also evoked articles that have been critical of Mr. Obama’s service in the Illinois state Senate.
“If we’re going to be hurling these charges against one another, I’m used to taking the incoming fire, I’ve taken it for 16 years,” she said. “But when you get into this arena, you can’t expect to have a hands-off attitude about your record. And it is perfectly fair to have comparisons and contrasts.”
“I also want to know on behalf of voters here in South Carolina, this kind of squabbling, how many children is this going to get health care?” he asked. “We have got to understand this is not about us personally, it is about what we are trying to do in this country and what we believe in.”
Also unlike previous debates where Mrs. Clinton was the target, Mr. Edwards took a sharp tone against Mr. Obama. He jumped into the Clinton-Obama tussle several times, and at one point was incredulous about an answer Mr. Obama gave during an exchange about a 2005 bankruptcy bill.
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- Two Ukrainian fighter jets shot down
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq