- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Clerk’s aide blamed for records error
Question of the Day
ANNAPOLIS — A low-level state employee is to blame for a disparity in state records that has led to a lawsuit seeking to invalidate billions of dollars in tax increases passed in the recent special General Assembly session, spokeswomen for the Democrat-controlled Assembly said yesterday.
An assistant clerk to Mary Monahan wrote a letter on Nov. 12 but dated it Nov. 9, while seeking to validate the actions of the Senate during the special session, said Alexandra Hughes, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Michael E. Busch and Lisa Fulton, a spokeswoman for Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr.
They made the statements as the clerk at the center of the suit gave her deposition.
“In retrospect, there’s still some ambiguity about the best way to capture proceedings like this,” Miss Hughes said.
Neither Mr. Busch, Anne Arundel Democrat, nor Mr. Miller, Southern Maryland Democrat, have spoken face to face with reporters about the suit filed in a Carroll Court by leading Republican lawmakers. Arguments in the case are scheduled for tomorrow.
Sources identified the assistant clerk as Colleen A. Cassidy and dismissed the error as common in “clerk world.”
However, Irwin R. Kramer, the lawyer who filed the suit, said the letter is a “complete fabrication.”
“Now we’re talking about a gross disregard not only for the Maryland Constitution, but for common-sense rules of ethics that we expect our legislators and those who work with them to uphold,” he said.The state constitution bars the Senate or House from adjourning for more than three days without the consent of the opposite chamber. The Senate adjourned for five days in the middle of the special session, although a judge has yet to determine whether it received proper consent.
That consent is critical to validating the three-week-long session, which resulted in a $1.3 billion tax increases and a measure on the 2008 ballot to legalize slot machines.
The suit argues the Senate never received proper constitutional consent to adjourn for more than three days.
The suit, though, has quickly turned less on whether the Senate received proper consent to adjourn, but on whether a House staffer fabricated documents in the process of showing consent.
Mrs. Monahan, the clerk responsible for recording and validating House proceedings, has been bounced between attorneys and multiple Maryland courts since the case was filed on Dec. 13.
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq