Subscribe to this story's comments
As history has shown, benevolence has only worked with unconditional surrender. Anything in between is a simulacrum of reality masked by relieving the social conscience, bias, and usually leads to corruption, the eventual disintegration of the stability and conditions worse than before. There are situations such as Iraq that can be controlled, but only as long as there is a long term resolve to make it work. The U.N. never has had that capability and has always been a tool for for relieving the global social conscience. I think John Bolton called it "normalizing".
I don't understand why any white person would still be a farmer in that miserable country. The handwriting has been on the wall for 30 years. Would you leave your family in such a dangerous and vulnerable position? Crazy!
Most of the world's problem spots were part of former French, British, Spanish and Portugese Empires. Name a trouble spot and It will be a one of those countries created by Old Europe. The U.S. has been cleaning up Old Europe's creations i.e. Iraq, created by the British, Dafur, created by the French, etc.
Everybody can see what "democracies" were created in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
But the libs, will never condemn the perpetrators, only because they have the "right" colour...
It seems to me that more people would be concerned that NOBama has belonged to a church which insisted that its members were AFRICANS first and that being 'american' came in somewhere down the line.
Of course, that problem has been covered by NObama saying he is more patriotic than anyone else. He just didn't say to which land his patriotism referred.
Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!






