The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion

BLANKLEY: Barack Obama's patriotism

Is it his pins, his words or his surrogates?

By Tony Blankley | Wednesday, July 2, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Op-Ed:

Sen. Barack Obama is about halfway through his "patriotism theme week" message cycle. As of 2008, John McCain is about seven-ninths through his patriotism theme life-cycle. I guess that is the difference between the new politics and the old patriotism.

The Obama campaign launched its new politics patriotism week on Sunday with Gen. Wes "speichellecker" Clark smearing Mr. McCain's war record - even to the point of the former general saying that "riding" in a fighter plane and getting shot down were not qualifications for being president. Well, in fact, of course, Mr. McCain wasn't riding. He was the pilot in his 23rd mission over heavily defended enemy territory when he was shot down by a Soviet missile. But when Gen. Wes "camera hound" Clark goes on a mission, he always aims low.

This is the same Gen. Clark who, while leading the bombing campaign against Serbia from his desk, was reprimanded by President Clinton's defense secretary, William Cohen, to "Get your [obscenity deleted] face off the TV. No more briefings, period. That's it." During that bombing campaign, Gen. Clark didn't even go along for the "ride." And he is the same general who was removed prematurely from his European command on the following explanation of the then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Hugh Shelton: "The reason he came out of Europe early had to do with integrity and character issues." This is the man who the Obama campaign - which is above politics as usual - sent out to smear a genuine war hero. Of course, after 24 hours Mr. Obama disassociated himself from his surrogate's smear attack. This is becoming a pattern of Mr. Obama's new politics. Gen. Clark is the seventh prominent Obama supporter to disparage Mr. McCain's military service. Mr. Obama is beginning to reveal Nixonian political instincts.

But Gen. Clark is right. Merely being a war hero is not qualification for the presidency - although it is a hell of a start when compared to those of us who never served in uniform. And the over five years as a POW with constant torture that Mr. McCain suffered through is also not qualification for being president - even when compared to Mr. Obama's tough seven years of service at Columbia and Harvard Law School.

But just maybe, the strength of character and the wisdom of knowing what really matters in life that young John McCain formed on the anvil of his captivity - just maybe those attributes are the beginning of qualifications for leading the rest of us through a dangerous, morally ambiguous world. And when a man so formed then dedicates the next 30 years of his life to studying and leading from the U.S. Senate on national-security issues - perhaps then we have the makings of a man fit to be president.

The test for Mr. Obama in this campaign will not be whether he can fly a jet fighter under enemy fire as well as Mr. McCain did, or whether he can put up with torture in as manly a fashion as Mr. McCain sustained for more than five years, or if he can go through his life not being able to raise his arms to his shoulder because his body was broken by the commie torturers. Mr. Obama, just as most of us, has been spared facing such tests and perhaps being found wanting - as many of us surely would be.

So far, Mr. Obama has faced less taxing tests such as whether to wear a flag lapel pin. So far he has scored an incomplete after three tries. First he decided to wear a pin. Then he thought better of it and announced that he would no longer wear the pin, explaining: "You know, the truth is that right after 9/11, I had a pin. …Shortly after 9/11, particularly because as we're talking about the Iraq War, that became a substitute for I think true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security, I decided I won't wear that pin on my chest. Instead, I'm going to try to tell the American people what I believe will make this country great, and hopefully that will be a testimony to my patriotism." Then, on his third try during the heated climax to his primary campaign he started wearing the pin again - I suppose as, in his previous words, "a substitute for true patriotism."

Hard to know for sure what his calculations are on this vital matter. But that he does constantly calculate whether to wear the pin or not, there can be no doubt. The demands of patriotism are sometimes hard to know. What's a patriot to do? Life can be hard, very hard, out on the old campaign trail. Please note, I am not questioning his patriotism. Many patriotic people - myself included - have never worn a flag lapel pin. (We have to be so careful these days, because Mr. Obama is more easily offended than a convent-schooled virgin. I am stocking up on egg shells to walk on for the duration of the campaign.)

Anyway, Mr. McCain had it easier over the North Vietnamese skies. He didn't have to decide about such things. He was required to wear his dog tags - evidence of his patriotism. Some people get all the breaks.

Tony Blankley is a syndicated columnist.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. Senate delays climate bill until September
  3. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks
  4. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  5. Iranians resume protesting election result
  6. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  7. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.