The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Tiger Woods injured in car accident

  • Security

    W. House praises IAEA's censures of Iran

  • Business

    Wall Street tumbles on Dubai fears

  • Local

    Private funeral Friday for Pollin

  • Politics

    Ads add heat to health care debate

  • National

    At Mall of America, it's business as usual

  • World

    Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Monday, July 7, 2008

EDITORIAL: Americans on energy independence

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

harry1

Energy independence is impossible. The energy market is global. The 2008 book "Gusher of Lies: The dangerous delusions of Energy Independence" by Robert Bryce discusses this situation. Harry W. Parker, PhD, PE
Mark as offensive

hipshot

Everyone ingnores the most important component of energy policy: ending mass immigration.
Mark as offensive

bunfight

Unless I have misread this article. There is something wrong with this survey. It does not seem to reflect other polls showing 70 plus demanding to drill now or other polls that show even the Europeans are questioning global warming.
Mark as offensive

ZEDWARD

THE DEMOCRAT CONGRESS CONTINUES TO BLOCK THE ONE THING THAT WILL STOP THE SURGE OF GAS PRICES - DRILLING, DRILLING, DRILLING ! SURE WE CAN KEEP WORKING ON ALL THE OTHER GREEN PROPOSALS AT THE SAME TIME, BUT UNTIL THEY ARE UP AND RUNNING, WE NEED TO DRILL. CONGRESS SHOULD FIND WAYS TO FORCE THE OIL COMPANIES TO DRILL AND BUILD NEW REFINERIES !
Mark as offensive

soxconn

All we want is a transition plan for energy independence. Perform a reality check on current and available energy reserves (this includes drilling in ANWR and offshore). Stabilize the current environment with existing environmental standards and then plan for a transition (physical and behavioral modifications) to energy independence. Don't take the extremist path down absolutes. Provide risk assessments and constraints, but don't tell me to improve gas mileage with emissions caps. Give the manufacturers something to work with. Follow the plan, not abandon it like the DOE in 73. Make the transition sensible both behavioral and physical. The easiest way to build infrastructure is from the cities out, like a network and then start connecting the cities. Come up with an alternative that has the same potential energy and UTILITY (i.e. exchangable lightweight batteries that get 400 miles minimum on a charge that can be recycled) as current carbon products. How about MAG LEV instead of airplanes? We can do it if we get our noses out of our PC/laptops. Right now Congress is in reactive mode because of blame politics and partisan power tactics. They need to be in proactive mode doing what right for the country and not their party.
Mark as offensive

gneubeck

With the current composition of the U.S. Senate that believes we can TAX our way out of our energy crisis, our Nation doesn't stand a prayer of extricating ourselves from this self imposed dilemma. Simply review the recent Senate action on HR 3121 where Harry Reid and his minions such as Clinton and Obama, in sync with the Left-Wing Fringe Elements in our society, voted AGAINST the opening of a miniscule portion of ANWAR; AGAINST shale oil extraction of which America has the equivalent of ten Saudi Arabia's in recoverable reserves; and, AGAINST accelerated efforts to facilitate the gasification of America's abundant reserves of coal. The task then for the RATIONAL MAJORITY in our Nation is SIMPLY to recognize the SOURCE that sustains and provides the base of support for the LEFT-WING FRINGE ELEMENTS in our society; and, to undertake a decisive role at the ballot box to isolate and relegate these FRINGE ELEMENTS THAT COMPRISE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE BASE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY to a decibel level that is barely audible. ANY TIME you vote for a Democrat, ANY DEMOCRAT, you're unmistakably multiplying the capacity of these LEFT-WING FRINGE ELEMENTS to continue to promote their radical agenda, and to bring our Nation to its knees. A circumstance that no external power ever could have accomplished. The ability to restore our Nation's status; and, to sustain this Sacred Land that the RATIONAL MAJORITY so proudly calls AMERICA, resides in your hands at the ballot box. GREG NEUBECK
Mark as offensive

bbcarr

If there were no restrictions of "any" type to drill for oil,would there be more wells?What is the motivation.When they are making a small profit now.Who do we rely on to tell us how much oil there is? I am an American. I don't believe anyone nor any entity has the Right to make a profit.If so,prove it.I thought it was a pursuit. Just like "Happiness".Rush Limbaugh can prove it. Ask him.A $400 million dollar contract.Anyone else hear him say "I am a business man first.We all agree the fat lazy over paid American wage earning laborer never did anything for this country.Goods and products are cheaper now.This cannot be denie.Trinkets everything we could live without are cheaper.Necessities, automobiles and energy, more expensive than ever,our dollar is weaker than ever.We Can live without cars and energy, I forgot "we are addicted".What ever President you wanted to be in office with what ever congress you want to make up,that same Congress could have stopped him from going to war,they all had the same info.Wait their millionaires too.If States were not stripped of the power they were meant have.It would take a majority of people in each state then a majority of states to go to war.One of the two Presidential candidates will save us. One does not believe in the First Amendment. Oops, that's not a Right. The other does not believe in the Second Amendment. Oops, that's not a Right.Our constitution was written by outdated doddering fools who knew nothing,about freedom,courage,economics and certainly the individual.I'll pick five Founding Fathers,they would not be allowed to know anything that has transpired since there deaths, they would have to defend the Document they bequeathed to us.You make up the opposing team of whomever and however many.You, pick the side you want to be on. Certainly the people who put money first will win every time. Yes I have an agenda. I am going to write book "How to Boil a Frog" If you can't wait for my book try reading "The 5000 Year Leap" I dare you. Who the heck do you think shut off the oil!
Mark as offensive

pfb32765

Here is a simple idea to find out where the Senate and House stands on this crisis of their own creation (we know where three quarters of the American people stand). Let's put forth a simple yes or no question to each member of Congress. "Are you in favor of drilling for more oil in areas now blocked such as the gulf and ANWR-yes or no"? None of this spin and obsfucation crap such as "the oil companies already have millions of acres leased, etc. would be allowed. A simple yes or no period! With the Democrat's propensity to never answer a straight yes or no question, this should be quite amusing. The whole process would be televised on CSPAN and it would be clear to the public where their so-called representatives stood on the issue. Everyone could then take appropriate steps in November.
Mark as offensive

firetoice

US energy independence IS NOT impossible. It may well be impractical, uneconomical and unnecessary. It would certainly require the investment of ~$10-20 trillion. However, obtaining the environmental permits to achieve energy independence by 2015 probably IS impossible.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
More Top Stories »
  1. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  2. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  5. In tobacco-loving Virginia, bars give up the habit

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  4. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  5. Finance mavens gloomy
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  2. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  3. Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. Global Warmists exposed

Most Commented

  1. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  2. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  5. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  2. Crashers probe may become criminal investigation
  3. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  4. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure
  5. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Are you planning to go shopping today?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Hall out, Rogers will start

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.