Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Baker, Christopher aim to boost war powers

GETTY IMAGES
Former Secretaries of State James A. Baker III (left) and Warren Christopher answer questions on Tuesday in Washington about the proposed bill, which was the result of a yearlong study.GETTY IMAGES Former Secretaries of State James A. Baker III (left) and Warren Christopher answer questions on Tuesday in Washington about the proposed bill, which was the result of a yearlong study.

A plan by former Secretaries of State James A. Baker III and Capitol Hill lawmakers, who applauded the idea of playing a larger role in deciding when to go to war.

“I love that, as a member of Congress. It’s a great idea,” said Iraq war policy.

“I think we’ve learned the hard way that it is harder to get out of a war than it is to get into one, and we had better think twice,” Mr. Durbin said, adding wryly, “In fact we ought to put it in the Consti … oh, it is in the Constitution.”

The Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to declare war and appropriate war funds, while the president, as commander in chief, has the sole power to manage battlefield strategy.

But the modern presidency has trumped Congress’ war authority as the evolving definition of war led to a “police action” in Korea, an “undeclared war” in Vietnam and the Iraq war, which critics say became a sustained counterinsurgency mission that went beyond the invasion authorized by the Senate in 2002.

The plan presented Tuesday called for a new law requiring the president to inform Congress of plans for “significant armed conflict” or operations other than quick emergency strikes. A new joint House and Senate committee with access to classified military information would review the president’s justification for war, and Congress would have 30 days to approve or reject the mission.

“What we aim to do with this statute is to create a process that will encourage the two branches to cooperate and consult in a way that is both practical and true to the spirit of the Constitution,” said Mr. Baker, who served under Republican Iraq Study Group.

The proposed legislation was the product of a yearlong study by a panel led by Mr. Baker and Mr. Christopher, who served Democratic President Clinton.

“Given that the old-time declarations of war are either nonexistent or changed, I do think it is something to look at,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat.

Mr. Schumer said his view would not change if the likely Democratic nominee for president, White House.

Mr. Obama, who opposed the Iraq war before his election to the Senate in 2004 and criticized the vote authorizing the invasion, voiced support for the study group’s work.

“Senator Obama commends this bipartisan study for advocating that the president consult Congress more closely on issues of critical national importance, like the use of military force,” Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor.

A top adviser to the likely Republican presidential nominee, Arizona, approached the proposal as if it were an academic exercise, noting that the debate over the extent of the president’s constitutional powers are “as old as the republic itself.”

He pointed out that Founding Fathers Europe, a declaration made without Congress’ approval and which broke a U.S. treaty with France.

“The Baker/Christopher war powers proposal is an interesting approach to this enduring issue,” said McCain campaign senior foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann. “As President, Senator McCain would make consultations with Congress a priority, especially in the issues of war and peace.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum greets supporters Feb. 7, 2012, after speaking at a primary night watch party in St. Charles, Mo. (Associated Press)

    Santorum sweep: Wins Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado

    By Valerie Richardson and Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses qualified pilots to operate Predator drones for surveillance along the border. Under the FAA Reauthorization Act, drones eventually could be used by police agencies and private companies across the U.S. (Associated Press)

    Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • Supporters of gay marriage celebrate outside the James R. Browning United States Courthouse in San Francisco on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, after a federal appeals court declared California's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle, Lea Suzuki)

    Appeals court rules Calif. gay-marriage ban unconstitutional

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now