The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Editorials

EDITORIAL: Iran's provocation

By | Thursday, July 10, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Iran's test fire of nine long-range and medium-range missiles on Wednesday was a shot across the bow. The Iranians are sending a strong signal to both Israel and America that they will not be intimidated by the threat of military action by either nation to abandoning their nuclear ambitions. The limitations of diplomacy and tepid economic sanctions are increasingly apparent to leaders in both Tel Aviv and Washington. The Iranians have only been further emboldened to thumb their nose at the international community.

Gen. Hossein Salami, the Air Force commander of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, stated that the war exercises are proof of Iranian "resolve and might against enemies" who threaten Iran. "Our hands are always on the trigger and our missiles are ready for launch," he said to Iranian state television. The point was effectively made. The missiles that were showcased have a range which can strike Israel, Turkey, the Arabian peninsula, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The military exercises were conducted at the Strait of Hormuz - which indicates that the Iranians can shut down a waterway through which 40 percent of the world's oil traffic passes. Thus, Iran is ready to both attack its neighbors and to imperil the economies of many nations, if necessary, by holding hostage a good portion of the world's oil supply.

Despite all efforts to contain the Iranian threat through multilateral diplomacy, the Iranian government persists in its nuclear ambitions. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stated in her recent trip to Prague: "We face with the Iranians, and so do our allies and friends, a growing missile threat that is getting ever deeper, and where the Iranian appetite for nuclear technology is still unchecked." In an effort to protect our European allies, the Bush administration signed an agreement with the Czech Republic whereby it will host a radar system that will become part of a U.S. missile defense system. This is a good step - but more than just defensive measures are necessary.

In June, Israel conducted a military exercise which was a rehearsal to a potential attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. The maneuver also demonstrated to the United States that the Israeli government may resort to military force if diplomatic efforts continue to fail. The problem, however, is that if Israel strikes Iran, they will need assistance to complete their mission. America will be dragged into the conflict. This will be necessary both to protect our ally and to prevent an economic calamity once Iran retaliates - as it surely will - by strangling the oil supply.

Iran's latest show of force confirms that it is not likely to back down from its current revolutionary trajectory. And Israel cannot afford to wait for Iranian power to grow much larger. This means America is obliged to toughen its stance against Iran now - or be inevitably dragged into an even more difficult situation later.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • This image from Iranian Television shows a Shahab-3 missile being launched, which officials have said has a range of 1,250 miles and is armed with a 1-ton conventional warhead. Iran test-fired nine long- and medium-range missiles Wednesday July 9, 2008 during war games that officials say are in response to U.S. and Israeli threats, state television reported. Associated Press.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  6. YON: Girl with no future
  7. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  9. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  10. Pelosi's mouse slated for $30M slice of cheese

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.