- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
Candidates’ tax plans agree: More debt
Question of the Day
If Congress fully adopts the next president’s tax policies unrelated to health care, average federal taxes in 2009 for the middle fifth of the American population would decline by $1,042 under an Obama administration and by $319 under a McCain administration, according to an analysis of their plans by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center (TPC), a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution.
Meanwhile, with congressional approval, average federal taxes for the top one-tenth of 1 percent of the population, which includes households that earn at least $2.9 million, would rise by more than $700,000 next year if Mr. Obama becomes president and would fall by nearly $270,000 if Mr. McCain wins the election.
These figures do not include Mr. McCain’s proposal to allow taxpayers to calculate their taxes under an optional alternative tax system, which would feature two rates, an increased personal exemption and a large standard deduction.
Former Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas, an economic adviser to Mr. McCain, told The Washington Times on Wednesday that the two tax rates would be 10 percent and 25 percent, which is 10 percentage points below today’s top rate.
A TPC analysis of a Republican Study Committee proposal to establish an alternative tax system with a top rate of 25 percent concluded that it “would disproportionately benefit those with very high incomes, making the tax system less progressive.”
These figures also do not include Mr. Obama’s recent proposal to apply Social Security payroll taxes to salaries above $250,000. Social Security taxes are now limited to the first $102,000 of wage and salary income.
Leonard Burman of the TPC has estimated that applying the full Social Security tax to salaries above $250,000 could increase Mr. Obama’s annual tax increase for the top one-tenth of 1 percent of income earners by an additional $400,000. The Obama campaign has not decided what Social Security rate will apply to incomes above $250,000.
Mr. Burman estimated that the top marginal tax rate, including state and local taxes, could reach 57 percent under Mr. Obama.
“A lot of high-income people can re-characterize their income to avoid paying the higher individual income-tax rates,” he said. “I’m concerned about the effect of high marginal individual and corporate income-tax rates on economic incentives and tax sheltering.”
Moreover, as long as Social Security tax revenues continue to exceed benefit payments, “the additional revenues collected by raising the Social Security income threshold would be spent on other government programs, while masking the deficit’s size,” Mr. Burman said.
The Obama tax plan in 2009 would redistribute $131 billion from the top 1 percent to all other taxpayers, said Scott Hodge of the Tax Foundation.
Mr. Hodge, citing Congressional Budget Office data, said that the top 1 percent of households paid nearly 40 percent of federal income taxes in 2005. The top 20 percent paid 86.3 percent.
“It is startling to learn how greatly the Obama plan would shift the tax burden further up the income pole,” Mr. Hodge said. “It’s the most ambitious redistribution of wealth in recent memory.”
“Income redistribution through the tax code entails less economic cost than other means of redistributing income, including limiting trade and increasing regulation,” Mr. Burman said. “Almost all the gains of the last 20 years have gone to the top 1 percent, putting enormous pressure on the political establishment to do something about it,” he said.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- N. Korean news agency: Kim Jong Un's uncle executed
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow