The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with Democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Obama timeline doable, Iraqi says

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Surge is credited for development by McCain team

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

soxconn

I do not see anyting in this article that says he consulted our military commanders and acknowledged their opinion before presenting his plan to Al Maliki. Did he ask General Petraeus if it was doable? It would also be interesting to find out what he feels the problem is in Afghanistan and how he will solve it. Two brigades won't be able to block the border of Pakistan. If he doesn't at least acknowledge the issue, it will become another Vietnam with a Bin Laden Trail in Pakistan instead of Ho Chi Minh. Obame needs to quit playing politics and analyze reality if he is going to lead. Right now all I see is a celebrity.
Mark as offensive

adcran

The press certainly has jumped on a lie in a hurry without conferring with the source. Iraq does not agree with Obama or his "plan". It is odd to me that he goes on a fact-finding trip with his plan already in place. From the picture above, it is evident that Obama's main support holds true in the military also. It is odd that blind trust guides our allegiances when someone appears to be like us. Obama is a left leaning socialist and will destroy the military and this country.
Mark as offensive

RogueAmerican

"while restoring our military and increasing our commitment to finish the fight in Afghanistan," she said" That would never happen with Obama as President. His views on a cut and run policy in Iraq would lend itself to Afghanistan in short order. When we send more troops to Afghanistan the operational tempo will increase, as it should. Then as we increase operations, the causality count will climb for our forces and for Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Obama is clearly on record being opposed to defeating our enemy, Al-Qaeda in Iraq. It wouldn't take long before he starts to sing the same kind of tune in Afghanistan that he did in Iraq.
Mark as offensive

Cobra

"McCain foreign-policy adviser Randy Scheunemann responded late in the day after the Democrats mocked the Republican's silence on the major development." Major development? Troop withdraw was the planed from the start, it's just taking longer than expected. What happened to Obama's "Out by Spring '08" plan that he offered in Jan. 07? The Senator introduced a bill to force the "redeployment," remember? Now he's saying he's willing to wait another 18 months or longer, depending on the conditions "on the ground." That's been the position of Iraq, Bush, and the military leadership since the beginning. It looks to me that the "major development" here is that Obama actually is agreeing with President Bush on troop deployment strategy in Iraq, he just doesn't want to admit it. What's the matter Obama, don't want to show people that Bush as right (we can't have that, can we?) so you try to claim this as YOUR victory? Well, I, for one, am not falling for it.
Mark as offensive

gneubeck

When finally confronting American troops, how will Obama explain the Senate votes to force our military members into an ignominious defeat in Iraq; and, to deny funding for equipments essential to their survival for the young men and women whom they had "previously" voted to commit to lethal combat. A despicable breach of trust with those Military members laying their lives on the line in defense of our Nation. It’s incredible how quick the left is to hoist the “white flag” when confronted with adversity. Sound familiar? How far are they willing to retreat from those who have a visceral hatred for our Western culture before we’re finally cornered? How many more 9/11s is the Left prepared to endure before they would be willing to stand and fight? The neurosis of the liberal mindset defies rational explanation. Surely members of “The Greatest Generation” who demanded total victory over the Fascists of WW II, must hang their heads in shame when they witness the American Left of today cowering before the modern day threat of Islamofacism! Obama is our "home-grown" version of Hugo Chavez. His comments that he would use U.S. Military Forces against Pakistan, a Nation with a sizable nuclear arsenal, and an ally in the war on terror, even without President Musharraf's permission; a Nation that he mistakenly believed to be Arab; his indecision/confusion as to whether Iran poses a serious regional threat; while in other commentary, stating that he would halt the U.S. military's development of advanced weapons systems demonstrates a profound ignorance of the geopolitical threat environment confronting America. His long-term subversive associations, and his immersion in seditious anti-American diatribe have indeed revealed Obama as the real-life Manchurian Candidate. Obama would most certainly follow the disastrous Foreign Policy examples of Jimmy Carter in pursuing relations with our avowed enemies, only much worse. Political charlatan, Obama, has convinced his robotic cult followers that he can meet with Ahmejinedad without precondition; and, that the Iranian Islamofacist will experience a now infamous Obama epiphany and conversion to righteousness; and, "There Will Be Peace In Our Time". This is the very same Neville Obama who, because he frequently babbles incoherently when attempting to speak without a prepared text, is terrified of being exposed by meeting John McCain in a simple Town-Hall Forum. God help us if the majority of Americans are beguiled by this novice circus comic, who has never before performed under the "Big Tent"; and, the peddling of his "Magic Elixir " that Obama has claimed will "Heal The Planet". Greg Neubeck
Mark as offensive

Pendamon

My God, Obama is like the rooster trying to take credit for the dawn! This is just more B.S. from B.O. What a phony. How can anyone not see through this Emperor and his "new clothes"?
Mark as offensive

ACarney

The picture with the article speaks volumes.
Mark as offensive

Frithfulee

BO's timetable is feasible because of the success of the surge, something that he voted against and opposed. BO's position in Iraq has been "defeat and retreat" for years and that is no mark of a US leader. The difference today is that we are achieving victory in Iraq, something that dims cannot still contemplate
Mark as offensive

Garland

You have said it all Greg Neubeck. When all of the euphoria dies down, reasonable and prudent voters will see that the Democrats have offered up a very dangerous candidate.
Mark as offensive

Garland

Katrina, its "defeat" for Obama. And it's McCain not McBush. You don't like it when your candidate is called Buckwheat, or even by his full name: Muhammed Hussein el Bin Laden Obama.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.