The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at the Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

  • National

    'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

  • Business

    Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Sunday, June 1, 2008

New look, options for Times readers

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

sftspike

I do not like the new print format. It is too dense, not enough open space, and the type face is not as readable as the old face.
Mark as offensive

daniel_p

I also do not like the new print format. It IS too dense, and it is difficult to read. Put it back the way it was, or I shall not read this site anymore.
Mark as offensive

alphakal

What sets apart a big daily from a community freebi, besides the national and world coverage, is extensve comics, and a daily TV listing!! A weekly TV insert is just not always up to date enough. Last night was a good example at 10 on channel 9: Your Sunday paper listing had the program right, but the weekly had it wrong (as did the Washington Post weekly). YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE DAILY LISTINGS! Are they really that expensive?! You pay for what you get....
Mark as offensive

Not_Chicken_Little

You "fixed" something that wasn't broke! The new format is harder to read, harder to find things. Did the Web Weenies talk you into making your site more "hip" with more gadgets and buttons and tabs? The design is terrible! I used to enjoy visiting the site daily - not anymore. I'll miss you!
Mark as offensive

jj1

Two comments: First, as for the new print format, I also found it too dense, but then found that for each story there is an opportunity to increase the font size (look for the "font size" option in the article). Second, I agree with Chicken Little about the difficulty of finding articles on this new site. I'm sure the web "consultants" are pushing heavily for this new idea of having one "big" story highlighted each day. But that's not what the Washington Times is good at and known for and sought after for. Those of us far away from the beltway want to be able to access all 10 news stories in the print edition each day. And then we want to be able to access all 6 stories in the metro section each day. This was easy to find on the old site. You need to find a way to restore this option on the new site. In short, if the web "consultants" want to provide color and one "big" story each day, then fine, keep that as an option. But you also need to provide a back-channel way for us news junkies around the country to be able to easily find all 10 "politics" stories in the paper each day, just as we were able to do on the old web site.
Mark as offensive

fredo

What is "A2"? Translation please.
Mark as offensive

makitmama

One constant at work was reading the washtimes while eating lunch. However, due to the complexity of the graphics and video I can't easily load or browse the paper at all. Since when I get home I am busy, this effectively means I can't use this website daily any more.
Mark as offensive

roitr

New web page is lots of glitz and no substance. Prefered the old format with its synopsis up front
Mark as offensive

jj1

Isn't there some way that you can automatically make the font size bigger as a default setting, without having to adjust the size upward each time you view a different article. Surely there's some way that the web designers could automatically let the font size be larger as a default, and then if anyone wants to make the font smaller, let THEM adjust it to make it smaller.
Mark as offensive

Buzzog

Sorry, but this is one poor 'upgrade'... It may thrill computer geeks but it leaves me COLD! WHY do I have to enlarge each article in order to read it? Why are articles printed only on one side of the page, the other side being wasted with far less than necessary garbage? Whatever happened to Inside The Beltway? In summary I get frustrated rather quickly as I WASTE my time and energy hunting for items of interest, and I then depart your weird new site.......Oh yeah,,,, Why is the site still one of the slowest to load on the web?
Mark as offensive

tomchemo

In recent times, we have seen the Washington Times: --eliminate some of the most useful and interesting features such as the Thursday Week-End section, the Sunday broadcast schedule for the upcoming week's sports events, and the Monday church feature. --decide to charge DOUBLE for the daily paper. --turn a perfectly fine website where the material was easy to get to with the piece of garbage we have now. --and, today, replace the Print Edition with that hideous monstrosity I got this morning. I have been a faithful and loyal reader of this paper for TWENTY years, ever since I moved to Washington, DC in 1988. But ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!! What you have done is completely unacceptable! If you want me back, it will ONLY be when you bring back the "old" Washington Times. The current management of the Times should be really proud of themselves for totally destroying such a fine newspaper in so short period of time.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. The enemy at home
  4. After the Berlin Wall: German unity proves elusive
  5. Patent case goes to Supreme Court

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  5. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  3. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  4. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  5. The enemy at home

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.