The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

OPINION: An agent of change

U.S. Institute of Peace hails new location

By J. Robinson West and Richard H. Solomon | Thursday, June 5, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

In the last 60 years, the United States has had to adapt to three major transformative shocks to the international system – Pearl Harbor, the Soviet takeover of Eastern Europe and the September 11 terrorist attacks.

The United States responded with alacrity to the first two. Yet seven years after the third, America´s foreign affairs agencies continue without a clear vision.

The institutions that guided our country through the Cold War are struggling to deal with challenges that mid-century policymakers could not have anticipated. Failing states, ethnic- and religion-driven turmoil, non-state terrorism, natural resource competition and humanitarian crises were not on the table when Washington designed ‘modern´ departments of state and defense in the 1950s and '60s.

Adapting our foreign affairs institutions to these dynamics has been slow to start. It may take the better part of a decade to complete. Developing policies, political consensus, and trained talent to create effective responses will take time.

But time is a luxury we cannot afford. The United States must accelerate its journey toward a comprehensive foreign crisis response mechanism.

Today, at the corner of the National Mall in Washington, we mark a watershed moment in that acceleration. This morning, President Bush, House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid will break ground on the permanent headquarters of the non-partisan United States Institute of Peace. The institute is an independent organization Congress created in the 1980s to develop effective options to curb international violence and manage international conflict. In recent years, it has found itself on the leading edge of responding to the changing global dynamic.

Today´s groundbreaking signifies more than the beginning of a construction project. It is the rarest of moments – a powerful intersection between global events and the evolution of an organization that is changing the paradigm.

The institute´s journey to this day has been an uncommon one. It was tiny in its initial years, and while it is still small today, its size and scope have grown significantly since the end of the Cold War. When America´s foreign affairs agencies began looking for a new path, the institute´s mandate had already acquired an unanticipated relevance. Since that time, its agility and independence from federal bureaucracy have helped it to develop extraordinary programs that have improved America´s ability to anticipate and respond to dynamic crises abroad.

In Iraq, the institute facilitated a peace negotiation between Shia and Sunni leaders in a violence-ridden area south of Baghdad – and in doing so, the institute established a process for stabilization efforts throughout the country.

Since the 1990s, institute specialists have developed effective legal frameworks for fragile states. They created Truth and Reconciliation processes, constitutional commissions and other mechanisms to develop civil society and governmental organizations. Their work has been essential to the stabilization of South Africa, Rwanda, Afghanistan, Iraq and Nepal.

The institute´s ability to convene disparate communities has helped organize coordinated responses to post-conflict stabilization missions in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has prepared U.S. military personnel, civilian police and African forces for peace operations.

The Institute of Peace is not designed to be a prime mover in foreign affairs – and it will never replace an existing agency. However. it is proving an essential agent of change in Washington´s approach to foreign policy.

Lying just north of the Lincoln Memorial and Vietnam Veterans Memorial and across the street from the State Department, the new headquarters´ distinctive architecture will be a prominent reminder of America´s continuing commitment to stability in a dynamic world. It will bespeak the national search for more effective ways of dealing with the threats and opportunities that were identified at the end of the Cold War and that crystallized in an instant on September 11.

The United States Institute of Peace has been gifted to place its headquarters on some of America´s most hallowed ground. This gift bestows on the institute a great responsibility – as well as a great opportunity – to help our country finally transition to an era in international affairs that dawned seven years ago.

* J. Robinson West is chairman of the board of the U.S. Institute of Peace and and founder of PFC Energy. Richard H. Solomon, former president of the institute, is a former director of policy planning at the State Department.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
Crew members from "Night at the Museum 2: Escape from the Smithsonian" move a camera onto the National Mall near the Capitol for filming in Washington in May.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Senate delays climate bill until September
  2. Inside the Ring
  3. Iranians resume protesting election result
  4. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  5. WH communications director leaving
  6. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  7. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  8. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  9. NRA raises concerns over Sotomayor
  10. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.