The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at the Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

  • National

    'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

  • Business

    Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Friday, June 6, 2008

COMMENTARY: Cluster behind the cluster ban

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

nelsondeu

"Steel On Target"....As much and as fast as you can....Destroy the bad guys quickly and violently....There is no "civilized" weapon of war....War by it's very nature is death sanctioned by political and military leaders of soverign countries....Terrorism has no rules....Terrrorist use every violent means at their disposal to randomly kill and main their victims....Those feel good jerks who wish to "civilize" war or weapons are just plain liberal morons!!!...
Mark as offensive

aero

Cluster weapons are extremely utilitarian anti-personnel armaments. We routinely carried them on fighter missions during the Vietnam war. The complication cited in the article is real and can be addressed by weapons engineers. For instance, perhaps the bomblets can be designed with a lapsing mechanism so that they become inert after a period of time.
Mark as offensive

petemurray

"By the company they keep shall ye know them...." In opposing this treaty we find ourselves in the company of five foreign countries with indifferent to appalling human-rights records. All the Western democracies save ours have signed this treaty. All our democratic allies have forsworn the future use of these cruel and revolting devices. They obviously belive that Western civilization can survive without these weapons. They will also be legally constrained from supporting US units equipped with these weapons. By failing to sign the treaty we may have turned our back on future joint military operations with civilized nations. The cluster-weaponary in the US arsenal has a statistical failure rate of between 40% (The US military) and 65% (Humanitarian NGOs). "Improved" munitions which are due to be phased-in to replace the existing weapons are projected to have a failure rate of "only" 10% to 20%(depending on terrain - unfortunately, technology can't ensure their use is confined to concrete surfaces!). The battlefield legacy of these devices will endure to kill and maim the innocent and unwary (frequently children) long after the conflict has ended and the soldiers have gone home. It is significant that Mr Bay attempts to impugn the motives of the people who sponsored this treaty rather than engage with their arguments. His reliance on personal invective makes one suspect that he knows the case for these weapons doesn't stand close scrutiny. By the way, what would Mr Bay, nelsondeu, and aero think of someone who scattered high-explosive booby traps around the area in which their children play?
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
More Top Stories »
  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  3. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  4. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  5. Choosing fantasy or facts

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  5. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  3. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  4. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.