The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with Democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, June 8, 2008

COMMENTARY: Are U.S. and Canada talking?

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Commentary Stories

  • Democrats sent reeling
  • BOOK REVIEW: Saudi life seen in wider context
  • Close the verification gap
  • A great day for liberty

By Peter J. Brown

A few months ago, in mid-February, Canada and the United States announced a new bilateral "Civil Assistance Plan."

U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart who commands the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) described the plan as follows in a USNORTHCOM press release issued in mid-February:

"This document is a unique, bilateral military plan to align our respective national military plans to respond quickly to the other nation's requests for military support of civil authorities. Unity of effort during bilateral support for civil support operations such as floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes and effects of a terrorist attack, in order to save lives, prevent human suffering and mitigate damage to property, is of the highest importance, and we need to be able to have forces that are flexible and adaptive to support rapid decisionmaking in a collaborative environment."

The roles of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Canada's Public Safety Canada are recognized in the plan. It appears to be a superb 21st century blueprint, while extending the strong ties that have existed for decades between the two countries.

"The two domestic commands - NORAD and USNORTHCOM in the U.S. and the Canadian Command in Canada - established strong bilateral ties well before the signing of the Civil Assistance Plan. The two commanders and their staffs meet regularly, collaborate on contingency planning and participate in related annual exercises," said the release.

While the new plan may look good on paper and suggests much improved communications and coordination between the two countries in times of emergency, a noticeable communications gap still lingers. Evidence of this first surfaced when Maine's adjutant general, Maj. Gen. Bill Libby (also commissioner of Maine's Department of Defense, Veterans and Emergency Management) told the press weeks after the plan was announced that it caught him completely by surprise and that he was never contacted by USNORTHCOM or Homeland Security let alone any of his Canadian counterparts about it in advance.

When record floods hit both Maine and the Province of New Brunswick in late April and early May in the St. John Valley borderlands, this communications gap became harder to ignore.

Canada activated the International Charter / Space and Major Disasters in late April so a number of surveillance satellites could be tasked to provide high-resolution satellite imagery of the flood zone in New Brunswick to Public Safety Canada and to provincial emergency management personnel.

It turns out the Maine Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and emergency management personnel in Aroostook County that shares a border with New Brunswick were left completely in the dark about the satellite-based surveillance under way in Canada. Maine simply relied on imagery obtained from several aircraft.

While the plan may speak of a "collaborative environment," the 2008 flood reminds everyone that whatever may exist for U.S. and Canadian military planners may not be extend to civilian emergency management and disaster response personnel. Not yet anyway.

Back in 2003, when the University of Maine Homeland Security Lab hosted a meeting of the Atlantic Region Integrated Border Enforcement Team (IBET) Communications Working Group, this writer and other speakers talked at length about the need for shared satellite assets, interoperable communications, mobile communications platforms and other related topics. Representatives from numerous U.S. and Canadian agencies assigned to the border attended.

Five years later, it is clear that, despite considerable progress, much work remains to be done on the U.S.-Canadian border.

Peter J. Brown, a freelance writer from Maine, writes frequently about the role of satellites in disaster response. He has worked on satellite technology and emergency communications-related projects with the American Medical Association's Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, the Maine Emergency Management Agency and others. He has also worked on improved alerts and warnings for the deaf and hard of hearing in Maine.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  2. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.