The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Local

    Court refuses to halt sniper's execution

  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Gulf Coast preps as Ida weakens to tropical storm

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

EDITORIAL: 'Fairness' is censorship

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

soxconn

The Fairness Doctrine is just another Democrat driven oxymoronic resolution. What exactly is fair about telling people what they have to say and what they have to listen too? It's like approving carbon cap legislation and then demanding more gas mileage from vehicles? Choking and engine reduces efficiency which reduces gas mileage. This should be titled oxymoronic legislation and it should be analyzed and stopped. It's no wonder congressional approval ratings are at 18%.
Mark as offensive

eesidge

I have been feeling for quite some time that the Democrat party is attempting to turn this country into a Dictatorship. What better proof that regulating our free speech?
Mark as offensive

stevedeery

We all know who this is aimed at. I would be willing to bet that if this was ever put into law, NPR would be exempt and Rush would be forced to SIRIUS.
Mark as offensive

topperj

I worked in radio when we were in fear of The Fairness Doctrine. We ran the most banal talk, public affairs and editorial content so as to avoid having to give airtime to "opposing viewpoints." This is NOT what radio should be, living in fear of the government. There are so many choices available today. It's obvious the Democrats don't like variety when it skewers them. We didn't fight for our independence and fight World Wars so a political party could shut up their opposition. Fight the power!
Mark as offensive

RDH

Fairness is CBS's Katie Couric putting Rush Limbaugh on for a quick segment. I saw how quickly CBS dropped that. As long as I make the call, I am all for this. Its about time someone made ABC/CBS/NBC nightly "news" fair. NPR could use a bit of restructuring too. That's what we are talking about isn't it? Fixing the obvious bias in the "mainstream media"? When do I start?
Mark as offensive

Cobra

News flash to liberals: Radio is no longer the primary source of news and entertainment in America. If you want "fairness" in radio programming and commentary, I suggest you start your own radio network. Oh, wait, you tried that and failed, didn't you?
Mark as offensive

WickedDickie

Soxconn, I believe approval of the Democrat run congress is down to 12 per cent. This should translate to votin' the bums out in November. But, our betters assure us the communistcrats will pick up many more seats and the incompetent racist Obama will be our president to "change" us back to the same old failed Dem programs. It's puzzling.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  4. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  5. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. The enemy at home
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. Patent case goes to Supreme Court
  4. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  5. After the Berlin Wall: German unity proves elusive

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  5. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  3. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  4. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  5. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.