The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Culture

Sikh sues Disney over right to wear turban

Claims he was denied religious rights and a park job

By Jennifer Harper (Contact) | Wednesday, June 18, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Mickey has the look. Donald has the look. Even Jafar has the look.

Sukhbir Channa, however, does not have the look.

The Sikh musician has filed a $1 million class-action discrimination suit against Walt Disney World, claiming the Florida theme park denied him employment because his religion requires him to wear a beard and a dastaar -- a turban -- which ultimately compromised company dress code.

Mr. Channa aspired to play the trumpet, dressed as a toy soldier in the Disney Christmas show.

In his claim, Mr. Channa said he "did not fit the Disney image" and was told by a hiring manager that he had a "look problem" that was incompatible with a Disney cast member.

The musician initially was hired in 2005 on the condition he wear a red turban to match the crimson berets of his fellow performers. He later was told to shave his beard and was dismissed after three months, according to the claim. Mr. Channa reapplied for the job in writing but to no avail.

Disney rejected Mr. Channa's claim. There was no record of his application. He was never denied employment and the case is "without merit," said spokeswoman Jacquee Polak, who added that the company values diversity in their performers.

Disney was recently named No. 1 on a list of "Best Places to Launch a Career" by Business Week and has a spectrum of hiring philosophies, public service initiatives, corporate responsibility statements and brand image management posted on its corporate Web site.

The company has been a litigation magnet over the years, attracting myriad lawsuits from former employees, musicians and interest groups.

Disney was sued by the Hell's Angels in 2006 for infringing on their copyrighted logo. A group of disabled patrons sued last year because the park banned their Segway transports from the grounds for safety reasons.

But the case of the rejected toy soldier has gotten new marching orders.

"Sikhs across the United States are often forced by employers and prospective employers to choose between religious freedom and a job, often told to remove their turbans, shave their beards or surrender other mandatory articles of faith to pursue career opportunities," the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund, which has taken up Mr. Channa's cause, said in a statement released Tuesday.

"It is also hypocritical for Disney to make millions of dollars promoting cartoon characters that wear turbans and simultaneously reject the right of an employee to wear a turban in accordance with his faith," said Manjit Singh, chairman of the D.C. group.

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee took Disney to task in 1995 for song lyrics and "Arab stereotypes" in "Aladdin," the animated blockbuster that earned the company more than $500 million. Disney changed the offensive lyrics but paid a cultural price of sorts in retaining the character of Jafar, a remorseless and ill-tempered character with swarthy skin, a heavy accent and turban.

Two years ago, "Aladdin" was included in "The 25 Most Controversial Movies Ever" list compiled by Entertainment Weekly.

Miami attorney Matt Sarelson, who is representing Mr. Channa, added his own piquancy to the proceedings, noting that as a Jew, he would be offended if Disney barred employees from wearing yarmulkes.

The popular press already is at work though -- the case was billed as "Mickey doesn't wear turbans" on Tuesday by TMZ, the cheeky tabloid TV show.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  8. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. YON: Girl with no future

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.