The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Local

    Court refuses to halt sniper's execution

  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Gulf Coast preps as Ida weakens to tropical storm

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Thursday, June 19, 2008

GAO hits Air Force deal

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Boeing gains track to rebid

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

straight_talk_hawk

MCAMNESTY'S PART IN THE BID RIGGING Please do a complete investigation of Frenchie McCain's part in this bid rigging, including girlfriend lobbyists. That guy was behind this corruption all the way, and needs to be exposed and held accountable. Some "national security" expert--he sells out our defense contracts to corrupt foreign corporations!
Mark as offensive

jmp

From reading local papers in WV recently, I thought the NG/Eads group was going to build some parts at the Bridgeport WV airport, using local people and transfers from other NG facilities in the US. The papers mentioned builing facilities at the airport to do this. So I think what Boeing says about losing American jobs is untrue, Where is Senator Byrd when they need him? He is in on most deals bringing business to WV, what does he have to say about this?
Mark as offensive

Radicalcentrist

As a taxpayer, I'm less concerned about who won than I am about why it costs $35 billion to build 179 planes which are basically just big, flying gas tanks. It seems like it would be much cheaper just to open up a few more bases so they could land on the ground and refuel. Particularly as we now have bases in, what, 80 counties?
Mark as offensive

marcus1

Hello Radicalcentrist..are you still there? The problem with your thesis is that it omits the military mission of tankers. Which is...to build a "tanker bridge" in the air to refuel our bombers and fighters along their merry way to destroy our enemies military assets far far away from any of those bases in your 80 countries. You may say, "what enemies?" "where are they?" I'm sure you can imagine at least one potential enemy. Hint: They are trying to steal all our advanced technology, and have more spies in the US now than the Russians ever had during the Cold War! That my friend is why we need an Air Force as big and strong as it can be. When any potential enemy takes a good look at our strength and ability to "reach out and touch someone", they will never want to test us. Our present tanker force is pushing 50 years average age and very expensive to maintain battle ready. Here is what our air forces have done. Since 1953 no American infantryman, upon hearing an airplane overhead, has had to bother looking up. It would always be a US Air Force or US Navy aircraft. Radicalcentrist, please let's keep it that way. Marcus Colonel, USAF (Retired)
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. House OKs health reform bill
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  4. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college
More Top Stories »
  1. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  4. The enemy at home
  5. Patent case goes to Supreme Court

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  5. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  2. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  3. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  4. Obama urges House to pass health care bill
  5. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No Portis/Bailey grudge match?

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.