The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > National

Lawyer to divide compensation of $36M

170 to share $36.6 million

By | Thursday, June 19, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) | Susan Holden built her legal career trying to get everything she could for people hurt in car accidents or by defective products.

Now the personal injury lawyer has the daunting task of dividing up $36.6 million among the more than 170 people who survived the collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge in August and the survivors of the 13 killed.

"If there is not enough money to go around, then we have to come up with a fair way to distribute what is there," Miss Holden said. "That is going to be no small challenge."

The compensation package was signed into law in May and capped victims' nine-month fight for state help recovering from the Aug. 1 bridge collapse, which injured 145.

The package is an unprecedented response by Minnesota, which is only liable under state law for up to $1 million for the entire incident. Still, victims' attorneys say the amount is too small.

A panel made up of Miss Holden, the 47-year-old former president of the Minnesota State Bar Association and two other personal injury attorneys has until Feb. 28 to make compensation offers to victims.

The offers will be final - no appeals - and victims have 45 days to accept. Given the state cap on liability, few are likely to decline.

Those who were on the bridge when it fell, or the families of those killed, could qualify for up to $400,000 from an initial pool of $24 million, although most would likely qualify for far less than that. Those with the most severe injuries or losses would qualify for compensation from an additional pool of $12.6 million.

There have been other government responses to major tragedies, most notably the federal Sept. 11 compensation fund that distributed more than $7 billion among more than 5,500 victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks.

But that fund had an unlimited amount of money authorized by Congress, unlike the Minnesota case, said Ken Feinberg, the attorney who ran the Sept. 11 fund.

"I didn't have this situation where one claimant said, 'You're giving me less because you're giving more to him - why?'" Mr. Feinberg said. "Here, the committee's going to have to divide up a finite amount of compensation. That's a tough assignment."

Miss Holden has been able to get her clients to understand when to take a reasonable offer, even when they hoped to get more, said Paul Godfrey, who represents the Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

"If there's anyone who can do it, she'll be able to explain to people, 'Maybe this isn't perfect but this is the best we can do,'" Mr. Godfrey said. "All she can do is be fair about it and splitting it up."

Chris Messerly, an attorney working with a coalition that represents more than 100 bridge victims, said he and other victims' lawyers have been scrambling to get their clients to see doctors so they can submit full medical documentation by the Oct. 15 deadline.

Victims will get private hearings with the panel before it decides in February how much compensation each should get.

Jennifer Holmes, whose husband Patrick was killed in the collapse, said she expects a "fair and good deal" from the panel.

"I'm confident that they'll follow the law and do what the law seeks to determine," Mrs. Holmes said.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Holden

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  6. Israeli know-how
  7. Recession tea leaves 'misread'
  8. Chaos theory -- and practice
  9. Ouster a threat for Md. GOP chairman
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.