- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
Blogger, AP meet about use rift
Question of the Day
The two sides in the Associated Press-blogosphere spat are talking now, but a war may loom anyway.
America’s biggest wire service wanted bloggers to pay for its content, as news organizations do, and threatened a lawsuit against Rogers Cadenhead, a Florida-based journalist who oversees the online Drudge Retort, a liberal answer to the much-viewed Drudge Report.
After a meeting Thursday night, the lawyers in the weeklong dispute hammered out some guidelines for content use, adding a productive dimension to a rift thus far accompanied by a lot of noise and plenty of publicity.
But Mr. Cadenhead said a major fight, similar to the late-1990s disputes between record labels and online music-sharing services, could be in the offing.
“I spent around two hours yesterday talking to AP attorneys about their specific objections to the user blog entries in dispute, going line by line through the text to pinpoint exactly where they have intellectual property concerns in the short excerpts that were posted. I won’t reveal the details of this discussion until AP releases the guidelines for bloggers that it promised on Monday.
“If AP’s guidelines end up like the ones they shared with me, we’re headed for a Napster-style battle on the issue of fair use,” said Mr. Cadenhead, who put headlines and snippets of AP stories on the Web site - a common practice among thousands of bloggers who routinely provide their readers with stories, citations and reference links.
Napster rerun or not, there already has been much melodrama. The AP announced earlier this week it wanted Mr. Cadenhead and other bloggers to pay $2.50 per word.
The online caterwaul was almost instantaneous. Hundreds of bloggers quickly responded by hurling insults, threatening a boycott of the AP and suggesting that bloggers charge the wire service for their own work. Mr. Cadenhead enlisted the help of the Media Bloggers Association, an industry group, and the dispute was splashed across the pages of the New York Times, Newsweek and other mainstream news outlets.
A calm has descended after days of potshots and posturing.
“In response to questions about the use of Associated Press content on the Drudge Retort Web site, the AP was able to provide additional information to the operator of the site, Rogers Cadenhead,” said AP spokesman Paul Colford on Friday.
“That information was aimed at enabling Mr. Cadenhead to bring the contributed content on his site into conformance with the policy he earlier set for his contributors. Both parties consider the matter closed,” he said.
“In addition, the AP has had a constructive exchange of views this week with a number of interested parties in the blogging community about the relationship between news providers and bloggers and that dialogue will continue. The resolution of this matter illustrates that the interests of bloggers can be served while still respecting the intellectual property rights of news providers,” Mr. Colford said.
Mr. Cadenhead is not so sure, however.
“I’m glad that my personal legal dispute with the AP is resolved, thanks to the help of the Media Bloggers Association but it does nothing to resolve the larger conflict between how AP interprets fair use and how thousands of people are sharing news on the Web,” he said Friday.
“I think AP and other media organizations should focus on how to encourage bloggers to link their stories in the manner they like, rather than hoping their lawyers can rebottle the genie of social news,” he said. “I don’t think the news service will be able to concede any ground to the blogosphere. AP sells headline and lead-only services to customers.”
About the Author
- The border crisis could prove a 'big boost' for Republicans as the midterms approach
- Inside the Beltway: Just a little media protection for the White House
- Some federal help for old American battlefields: $1.3 million to spruce them up
- Inside the Beltway: Frugal-phobic Congress offers 828 spending bills
- It's grim: 911 Commission warns terrorism has entered 'a new and dangerous phase'
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq