The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Local

    Court refuses to halt sniper's execution

  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Gulf Coast preps as Ida weakens to tropical storm

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

Home » News » Local

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Proposed state rule worries parents of special-ed youths

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

shell

As a special education advocate for children and youth throughout the Metropolitan Washington DC area, I am very surprised to read that Virginia is proposal to eliminate special education services for children and youth, without parental consent. That is a major infraction to IDEA and the extensive history of Public Law 94-142, the original law, that ensured children with disabilities received an appropriate education based on unique and distinctive individualized needs. It has taken years to have parents become full and equal partners to the decision-making process. We certainly do not need to have less parental support and involvement. I have seen the detrimental effects of not having parents a part of the special education process, in the denial of their rights, and subsequently, those of their disabled children. This would be moving in the wrong direction and would most likely increase greater distance between home and school, a relationship that schools across and within districts nationwide are trying to improve. We cannot improve special education paper work without qualitative changes and greater accountability to those school personnel, who are in responsible charged at each and every level of identification, evaluation, and placement of children in need of special education services. I do hope communities throughout Virginia will strongly fight to prevent this particular change in policy and any other that adversely affects FAPE for families of children and youth with special education needs.
Mark as offensive

IDEAliterate

The proposed Virginia law will NOT eliminate special education services to eligible students with disabilities...the law would continue to meet the IDEA as that law does not require parental consent to exit a noneligible student. The IDEA allows for the IEP team, of which the parent is a member, to make eligiblity decisions. Should the student be determined to no longer be eligible for services, the IEP team must make the decision to exit the student. If the parent does not agree, the school members of the IEP team can make the decision to exit..without parental consent...the parent would then have the opportunity to pursue their rights under the IDEA to challenge that decision in a due process case....this proposed law would not authorize school teams to make decisions that are not in line with the provisions of IDEA.
Mark as offensive

ktp1995

"...the parent would then have the opportunity to pursue their rights under the IDEA to challenge that decision in a due process case....". The idea that due process (or any of the substantive rights under IDEA) are as easy as this poster states is such a falsehood. State education complaints, mediation, and due process are all exceptionally swayed in the school district's favor as to be outrageuous. In addition, due process can cost a parent thousands of dollars in expert witness fees and lawyer fees while the school district has unlimited resources (ie taxpayer dollards)to fight the parents at every level of appeal (just look at your school districts legal fees..they are in the millions). IDEAliterate seems to think that IEP teams always make the right decision and that "the proposed law would not authorize school teams to make decisions that are not in line with the provisions of IDEA". Ask any parent with a child who has special needs how often the school district has made decisions that weren't in line with IDEA....I've got news for you...it happens all the time.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  4. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  5. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. The enemy at home
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Patent case goes to Supreme Court

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  5. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  3. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  4. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  5. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Now that the House has passed the health reform bill, do you think the Senate will try to kill it?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.